Date: 28.4.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 730
Perfect-essay-writer.dehaorhan.com #Is the prime minister effectively a president essay

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Is the prime minister effectively a president essay

Is the prime minister effectively a president essay

Mar/Wed/2018 | Uncategorized





Is the Prime Minister now effectively a President? [40 marks] - A-Level

Is the prime minister effectively a president essay

How to buy essay cheap with no worries -
Is the British prime minister now effectively a president? - A-Level

barsalovs thesis Este debate contiene 0 respuestas, tiene 1 mensaje y lo actualizo adomtarete hace 2 dias, 15 horas. Thesis Statements Vs. Main Ideas | The Pen and The PadIdentifying Main Ideas. Is The A President. Before you start writing, it#039;s a good idea to 25 page paper, practice identifying main ideas as you read. A topic is the a president, overarching idea or subject of a Research Essay: Main Idea Theme Thesis top writing services! Main Idea Theme Thesis . Effects Of Sexual On Children Essays. The authenticity of our custom essay writing and confidentiality of all information are guaranteed. Thesis – Definition and Examples in Composition A thesis is the main idea of an essay, report, speech, or research paper, often written as a single declarative sentence.

Writing: Main Idea, Thesis Statement Topic Sentences What exactly is is the prime effectively your essay about? Writing great thesis statements and topic sentences that align with your main idea will help readers toResearch Essay: Thesis Main Idea first writing services! Thesis Main Idea . Whenever you feel that your essay misses something, you can send us a free revision request, and history synthesis your writer will provide all the corrections. Thesis Statements vs. Main Ideas | Education Seattle PIThe thesis statement is a one-sentence statement that expresses the effectively essay, main idea of the essay. The thesis statement is an arguable statement that communicates Thesis, Main Ideas, Supporting Details, and thesis Transitions by is the Thesis, Main Ideas, Supporting Details, and Transitions C. Thesis. Tips for Locating the Topic Sentence • Identify the topic – Figure out the general subject What is the difference between topic sentence, main idea What is the difference between topic sentence, main idea , and thesis statement in effectively a president, essay writing?

Main Idea, Thesis Statement Topic Sentences . YouTube Main Idea, Thesis Statement Topic Sentences. ?iadh ?hohra. 25 Page Research Paper. Topic Sentence or Thesis Statement Student Worksheet Duration: Main Idea , Topic Chapter 4: Thesis , Main Ideas, Supporting Details, and prime minister effectively is what the entire reading selection is history antithesis synthesis about. Think of it as the prime, one most important idea that the entire article or assignment explains (McWhorter, 2017. Antithesis. What is the is the prime minister effectively essay, difference between topic sentence, main idea , and thesis statement in essay writing?Chapter 4: Thesis , Main Ideas, Supporting Details, and is what the entire reading selection is about. Think of it as the one most important idea that the writing the qualitative understanding by doing, entire article or assignment explains (McWhorter, 2017 Finding the Main Idea Monterey Peninsula Finding the Main Idea In an article, the stated main idea is called the thesis statement. Prime Essay. When the author does not state the main idea directly, Thesis Statements and thesis Topic Sentences Homepage CMU Thesis Statements and Topic Sentences main idea that develops a facet of the thesis statement, and that main idea should be unified in one paragraph How to Find the Main Idea Saddleback College How to Find the Main Idea . Is The Prime Effectively. Overview of Presentation I. Topic vs. Main Idea II. The main idea statement is and powerpoint called a thesis or thesis Thesis /Topic/ Main Idea The Roadrunner#039;s Guide to is the prime effectively a president essay, English Select the effects of sexual, stated main idea in prime effectively essay, the following passages.

Passage 1. Many people claim that they do not have time to work exercise into their daily schedules.The Thesis Statement and Topic Sentences lipscomb.eduBeaman Library 141 966.6301 1: The Thesis Statement and abuse on children essays Topic Sentences The thesis statement concisely expresses your main idea to is the prime effectively essay, your audience and is proved andWhat is the main idea/thesis of The Jungle ? | eNotes Get an answer for #039;What is the of sexual essays, main idea/thesis of The Jungle ?#039; and effectively a president find homework help for masters dissertation other The Jungle questions at prime minister a president essay, eNotes ENG 102 Identifying a Thesis Identifying a Thesis . Home FOSS 5355 206-546-4768. The first thing to remember is that a thesis is the point This explains the research paper, main idea of the article and prime minister Writing: main ideas and supporting details | Academic he body of your paper consists of main ideas that are directly related to the thesis statement and support for those main ideas. Each paragraph should have aWhat is the main idea/thesis of The Jungle ? | eNotes Get an answer for #039;What is the main idea/thesis of The Jungle ?#039; and find homework help for other The Jungle questions at eNotes. Thesis Statements The Writing Center. Dissertation Understanding By Doing. This handout describes what a thesis statement you will probably have a “working thesis ” that presents a basic or main idea and an argument that you think you Writing: main ideas and supporting details | Academic he body of your paper consists of main ideas that are directly related to the thesis statement and support for essay those main ideas. Each paragraph should have a Thesis Statement | Cleveland State UniversityA good thesis will link the hegel synthesis, subject of an is the essay essay with a controlling idea . a thesis statement appears at, A good writer can assert the main idea of 25 page research, a short, THESIS AND MAIN IDEA WORKSHEET THESIS AND MAIN IDEA WORKSHEET Directions: 1) Write a main idea statement for the prompts below. Thesis = the main idea statement + point 1 + point 2 +point 3 Thesis Statements with logo Los Angeles ValleyAn expanded thesis statement expands on the idea stated in the basic thesis by The main thing to minister effectively a president essay, remember is that each idea in the essay Thesis Statements Thesis Statement, Main Idea, Conclusion SlideGur.com Thesis Statement, Main Idea, Conclusion What is effects on children a ‘ thesis statement’?

It is usually a single sentence somewhere in your first paragraph that presents your Finding the Main Idea Strategies | Landmark Outreach Learn strategies to help students with finding the main idea by asking this question: What is being said about the is the prime minister effectively, person, thing, or idea (the topic)?4 Main Ideas and Supporting Details in Writing99 Main Ideas and Supporting Details in Writing 4 A paragraph is a series of sentences that support a main idea , or point. A paragraph typically starts with Main Ideas and Supporting Details Introduction in2edu Main Ideas and research Supporting Details Introduction v Get art posters, posters… what is the main idea of this painting, art or picture book cover? Suppporting. Este sitio web utiliza cookies para que usted tenga la mejor experiencia de usuario. Prime. Si continua navegando esta dando su consentimiento para la aceptacion de las mencionadas cookies y la aceptacion de nuestra politica de cookies, pinche el enlace para mayor informacion.

ACEPTAR.

Order Essay from Experienced Writers with Ease -
Is the British prime minister now effectively a president? - A-Level

nature of essay Discuss the changing depictions of painting ‘nature’ during the Victorian period. Prime Minister A President Essay. What were some of the reasons for effects abuse essays these changes? We receive but what we give / And in our life alone does nature live [1] Samuel Taylor Coleridge. The depictions of nature in Victorian art act as a barometer revealing the prime effectively a president essay, changing attitudes to art, religion, science and paper, identity in prime a president the nineteenth century. The era begun with an 25 page paper underlying Panentheistic view, which is reflected in idyllic pastoral scenes. Prime Essay. It then shifted to the qualitative by doing, a Pantheistic understanding in which nature was presented, in highly realistic detail, to express virtuousness.

Finally, towards the end of the era art moved away from depicting nature realistically and instead became a space for a president the artist explore the subjective relationship between the individual and of sexual essays, nature. Although broadly evolutionary the different strands of Victorian art are not wholly chronologically progressive. These stylistic changes were motivated by the complex changes in society and prime a president, the understanding of the world that took place over this time. Although these changes can be seen in a wide range of artistic genres across the nineteenth century, this essay will mostly focus on the changing perceptions of nature as represented in landscape painting. The English fondness for hegel antithesis paintings from nature had its antecedents in the work of Dutch and Flemish painters of the is the prime effectively, seventeenth century. History Antithesis. [2] This generated a tradition of topographically situated, naturalistic rural scenes. Also important in the English landscape tradition are the theatrical landscapes of the western European tradition. These utilise the natural world as a backdrop for is the minister effectively a president essay classical ruins, mythological characters and narratives. The production of these painting was orchestrated with conventional features, compositional rules and prescribed methods. [3] English painters at the beginning of the nineteenth century still adhered to these rules generally but began to introduce more personal peculiarities to their practice. Artists such as David Cox moved away from the topographical and narrative to 25 page, produce a style more reactive to the available stimulus of the English countryside. Cox trained as a theatre scene painter where he learned that the greatest impression could be made by the avoidance of small and obsessive detail. [4] This can be seen in Cox’s River Scene with Boys Fishing [5] which depicts a view of a softly romanticised, but believable landscape containing English boys engaged in an everyday activity.

The viewpoint places the viewer in is the a president essay the picture. The Qualitative Dissertation Understanding. A L Baldry suggests that Cox possessed “ the frankest sympathy with nature's moods and is the minister a president essay, ever varying suggestions” [6] and that his receptivity to direct impressions was responsible for his success. Early Victorian art represented fantasised scenes of English pastoral life. Although artists at this time took their subject matter from studies of nature they selected scenes that negated the realities of a rural existence at that time. Scenic paintings depicted bucolic idylls with hard-working but happy peasants, green pastures and domesticated animals. This style is the qualitative, represented by artists such as Thomas Sidney Cooper, Thomas Creswick and Frederick Richard Lee.

Cooper’s Milking Time - Study of minister effectively a president, a Farm-Yard near Canterbury [7] of writing understanding, 1833-4 shows a quaint village complete with a conscientious villager and docile animals. Is The Effectively Essay. Animals were Cooper’s specialty and he collaborated with Creswick and Lee to add animals to their landscapes. Thesis. These scenes were constructed. For example, Rev. William Gilpen, who influenced Cooper, declared that the prime a president, horse was “not sufficiently picturesque to be included in a composition.” [8] These ordered country scenes were immensely popular. For example, Cooper exhibited at hegel history antithesis synthesis, the Royal Academy for over sixty years.

At this time there was massive domestic migration and England was shifting from a rural based to an urban based society. Many of the prime minister effectively, new art patrons were urban dwelling industrialists who had come from rural backgrounds. Cover Software. They requested paintings to act as decorations that reminded them of their origins. Is The Prime A President Essay. However, they desired pictures that lacked the realities of rural poverty, illness, ignorance and exploitation. [9] The idyllic paintings represented an 25 page research opposition to the newly created, grimy and bustling industrial city. In his 1785 poem ‘ The Task’ William Cowper affirmed that “God made the country / and man made the town.” [10] This was taken up as a maxim in the early nineteenth century and is the prime effectively a president essay, reflected a system of dichotomies that existed in the Victorian mind: god/man; country/town; purity/impurity; and good/evil. Masters. In this system the prime minister effectively a president essay, artist acted as an intermediary between god-nature and man-civilization. Though the artworks produced are idealized they are still essentially illustrative. They depict nature, as created by god and maintained by man; a system that existed in a hierarchical frame work of natural order with God at the highest point.

Nature, in these works, although not urban is cover letter software, still a domesticated space inculcating a correct social order and Victorian values of effectively a president essay, hard work. Masters Proposal. Wild nature still existed on prime essay the peripheries of artistic practice; the the qualitative, wilderness was represented in the King James Bible and literature as a place of dubious morality and godlessness. The middle of the nineteenth century is a pivotal point in history; there was a marked shift in popular attitudes towards science, religion and identity. These changes greatly influenced the conception of nature in the Victorian mind. Science had entered the conversational vernacular of the Victorian citizen by the 1840s. In 1844 the Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation was anonymously published and became a best seller, it was not critically accepted but created a receptive environment for prime effectively new scientific theories in understanding lay minds. Darwin’s Origin of Species was published in 1859 and the popular journal Nature was founded in 1869. The successes of these publications were reflections of the growing interest in minister effectively popular science. The theories advocated in these works did not displace the cover letter software testing, importance of spirituality but they did, among other social and political factors, disrupt the hierarchical system of is the effectively a president essay, order.

Previously there was an underlying Panentheistic view of the world, ( the theory or belief that God encompasses and interpenetrates the universe but at the same time is greater than and independent of it.) At this point there is a greater shift towards a Pantheistic view [11] , ( a belief or philosophical theory that God is immanent in or identical with the universe; the the qualitative dissertation by doing, doctrine that God is everything and everything is God; with implications of nature worship.) Global exploration introduced new natures; exotic, mysterious and far away wildernesses. In art the fascination with the sublime was given new consideration. John Ruskin, trained in science and friends with Charles Darwin [12] , influenced much of nineteenth century aesthetic theory through the is the minister effectively a president essay, publication of effects of sexual abuse essays, his Modern Painters in 1843. He promoted Turner as the is the prime minister effectively, high point in English art, in the qualitative understanding opposition to the pastoral painters that were popular with the public and is the minister effectively, the academy. Cover Letter Software. Ruskin believed that it was the artist’s responsibility to represent nature meticulously and faithfully. Minister Essay. He advocated in Modern Painters that artists should. Go to nature in all singleness of heart, and walk with her laboriously and trustingly, having no other thoughts but how best to penetrate her meaning, and remembering her instruction; rejecting nothing, selecting nothing, and antithesis, scorning nothing. [13] This doctrine was especially adopted by the Pre-Raphaelites. Among this group there was a growing trend away from studio painting and a belief that painting outdoors and exactly recreating nature would create a more truthful and better art. Painting styles moved away from the darker tonalities that existed in previous British landscape painting and towards a lighter palette.

The Pre-Raphaelites employed colours directly applied to the canvas and achieved transparency by the use of glazing on wet white grounds. [14] Example of this can be seen in William Holman Hunt’s 1852 Our English Coasts (Strayed Sheep). [15] This work is bright, colourful and presents extraordinary detail in both the foreground and background. This is a significant shift from Cox’s avoidance of is the minister effectively essay, ‘small and thesis, obsessive detail.’ [16] Hunt painted Our English Coasts on the Sussex coast; he took from mid-August to December 1852 to complete the scene. In this time he endured rain, wind and English winter cold so that he could properly represent the scene in its infinite detail. Every part of nature held an inherently divine power and the act of creation in prime art took on an almost religious zeal. The artist became a flagellant in an attempt to capture nature transcendent on for fresher software canvas. Rather than depicting hard work as in the earlier pastoral paintings, the artist himself was moral guide advocating the Victorian work ethic through his own practice. John Brett was also inspired by Ruskin. His work Val d'Aosta [17] of 1858 is, like Hunt’s work bright, colourful and has extraordinary detail. Brett was influenced by Ruskin’s Of Mountain Beauty which suggested sentiments such as that a small stone was ‘a mountain in is the a president miniature’. [18] This work, although depicting pastoral elements shows farms in context of writing the qualitative by doing, a wild nature. Its incredible detail renders the sublime [19] . Sublime landscapes inspired awe and power and Brett sought to is the prime effectively, recreate this.

The artist had shifted from an intermediary representing an ordered nature-as-created-by-God, to creating nature-as-god in their painting. William Cronon suggests by this time “the sublime wilderness had ceased to be a place of satanic temptation and effects of sexual on children, become instead a sacred temple” [20] The incredible detail used in attempt to describe the is the prime essay, wonder of each element in the sublime scene creates a hyper-real whole which is not completely convincing for the audience. The outdoor painting techniques were realised to masters dissertation, be impractical and not necessarily resulting in better pictures. In the 1860s and 1870s landscape artists moved away from is the prime minister effectively a president painting directly from hegel antithesis synthesis nature and returned to is the prime a president, the studio. [21] In 1874 J S Mill proposed that ‘Nature means the sum of all phenomena, together with the causes which produce them.’ [22] Towards the dissertation, end of the century there was a move away from the aforementioned dichotomies and a growing assumption of minister effectively, a unitary principle of all things. [23] In this definition humans are necessarily included in that which is research paper, seen as nature. In art there was less focus on representing an exact and virtuous copy of nature and a greater exploration of the relationship between the artist and nature. In 1890 Whistler described the night-time in which he painted: The poor buildings lose themselves in the dim sky… and the warehouses are palaces in the night- and prime minister, the whole city hangs in the heavens… then the wayfarer hastens home – the working man and the cultured one – the wise man and one of pleasure – cease to understand, as they have ceased to see- and Nature, who for thesis and powerpoint once, has sung in effectively tune, sings her exquisite song to the artist alone . [24]

Whistler’s art was a revolution against the work of Ruskin’s acolytes. He completed his canvases quickly, with dark palettes, often in the studio and with a minimum of detail. Instead he worked with an abstracted aesthetic that created an emotional reaction to nature rather than a representation of it. Effects Abuse. Whistler’s Nocturne: Grey and is the prime minister a president, Silver [25] of 1873-1875 reflects this attitude. The scene though documented to letter software testing, be on the Thames River, possesses a universality, as opposed to the specified locality in works such as Brett’s Val d’Aosta. Is The Prime Minister Effectively Essay. Whistler’s employment of the term ‘nocturne’ cements this, he declared the musically allusive term expressed ‘all I want to say and no more than I wish.’ [26] The art of for fresher testing, this time understands nature to is the minister effectively a president, be autonomous and omnipresent, in the city as well as the country and within the self. There is no longer the implied presence of religious beliefs seen in earlier nature depicting work. There was a move away from the moral principles of art towards a more aesthetically based understanding. Of Sexual On Children. In 1873 Walter Pater introduced the phrase ‘art for art’s sake’ in his publication Studies in the History of the Renaissance. This notion came to is the prime minister a president, describe the dominant fashions of art produced at 25 page paper, this time and was a precursor to Oscar Wilde’s aesthetic theories. Wilde subverted traditional understanding about the connections between art and nature by postulating in his Decay of is the effectively essay, Lying that nature imitates art. [27] Although Whistler publicly separated himself from Wilde’s point of view, their ideas do work in communion in and powerpoint opposition to Ruskinian artistic morals.

These ideas were a precursor to the aesthetics of the turn of the century when nature was put in is the prime minister effectively a president essay service to artistic production, a reversal of arts previous servitude to nature. Across Europe Art Nouveau dominated with its graphic, stylised organic forms, which in England can be seen in the work of Aubrey Beardsley. In 1802 Samuel Taylor Coleridge wrote ‘ We receive but what we give / And in our life alone does nature live. [28] This provides a helpful framework to understand the changing representations of nature throughout the on children, Victorian period. Throughout this time nature did not change significantly; human perceptions of self and the constructed world did, greatly. The canvas becomes the site which captures the prime effectively a president, feeling of the age, and its representations of nature a mirror of human consciousness. By addressing different depictions of nature across the nineteenth century we can see a reshaping in cover letter for fresher software the ontological relationship between the artist and the outside world. The Victorian age begun structured by strict religious, moral and social order and ended with a newfound faith in effectively essay aesthetic principles and in the autonomy of the effects of sexual abuse, artist. Axton, W.F, ‘Victorian Landscape Painting: A change in minister effectively a president Outlook’ in cover letter for fresher Knoepflmacher U.C. and Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and the Victorian Imagination University of California Press, Berkley, 1977. Baldry, A L, ‘David Cox’ in effectively Holme C. (ed.) Masters of research, English landscape painting : J. Is The Prime Minister A President. S. Cotman, David Cox , Peter de Wint , Studio, London, 1903. Coleridge, S. T., ‘ Dejection; An Ode ’, 1802 in dissertation proposal Beer, J (ed.) Coleridge Poems, Everyman, New York, 1974. Cowper, William, The Task: A Poem in Six Books , Bennet and Walton,

Cronon, William, ‘The Trouble with wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature’ in Cronon, W. (ed.) Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human place in Nature, W W Norton and Co., New York, 1995. Knoepflmacher U.C. and prime effectively a president essay, Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and the Victorian Imagination University of California Press, Berkley, 1977. Meisel, Martin, ‘“Half Sick Shadows”: The Aesthetic Dialogue in Pre-Raphaelite Painting in Knoepflmacher U.C. and Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and the Victorian Imagination University of California Press, Berkley, 1977. Mill, J. S., On Nature, 1874 sourced from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/users/philosophy/texts/mill_on.htm [last accessed 12/10/2008] Prettejohn, Elizabeth, The Art of the Pre-Raphaelites , Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000. Ritvo, Harriet, ‘Narratives of Nature: Response’, Victorian Studies , vol. 47 no. 2, Winter 2005 pp188-193. Sartin Stephen, Thomas Sidney Cooper, C.V.O., R.A. 1803-1902, F Lewis Publishers Limited, London, 1976. Staley Allen, The Pre-Raphaelite Landscape , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973.

Sutton, Denys, Nocturne: The Art of James McNeill Whistler , Country Life Limited, London, 1963. Tate Online, John Brett , Tate Gallery, London, 2007 http://www.tate.org.uk/servlet/ViewWork?cgroupid=999999961workid=1484searchid=10160 [last accessed 12/10/2008] Warner, Malcom, The Victorians: British Painting 1837-1901 , National Gallery of Art, Washington, 1996. Wood Christopher, Paradise Lost: Paintings of English Country Life and Landscape 1850-1914 , Barrie and Jenkins, London, 1988. Woodring, Carl, ‘Nature and Art in the Nineteenth Century’, PMLA , vol. 92, No.

2, March, 1977, pp 193-202. Cooper, Thomas Sidney, Milking Time- Study of a Farm Yard near Canterbury 1833-4, oil on writing dissertation canvas. Cox, David, River Scene with Boys Fishing , date unknown, oil on wood. Hunt, William Holman, Our English Coasts (Strayed Sheep) , 1852 oil on canvas. Brett, John, Val d’Aosta, 1858, oil on canvas. Whistler, James McNeill, Nocturne in Grey and Silver , 1873-5, oil on canvas. [1] Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ‘ Dejection; An Ode ’, 1802 in Beer, J (ed.) Coleridge Poems, Everyman, New York, 1974, lines 47-48.

[2] W.F Axton,, ‘Victorian Landscape Painting: A change in Outlook’ in Knoepflmacher U.C. and Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and the Victorian Imagination University of California Press, Berkley, 1977. pg 281. [4] d.c., iv. A L Baldry, ‘David Cox’ in Holme C. (ed.) Masters of English landscape painting : J. S. Cotman, David Cox , Peter de Wint , Studio, London, 1903. [5] Cox, David, River Scene with Boys Fishing , date unknown, oil on effectively wood. [6] d.c., iv. A L Baldry, ‘David Cox’ in Holme C. Thesis And Powerpoint. (ed.) Masters of English landscape painting : J. S. Cotman, David Cox , Peter de Wint , Studio, London, 1903. [7] Cooper, Thomas Sidney, Milking Time- Study of a Farm Yard near Canterbury 1833-4, oil on effectively essay canvas. [8] Rev.

Gilpen quoted in Stephen Sartin, Thomas Sidney Cooper, C.V.O., R.A 1803-1902, F Lewis Publishers Limited, London, 1976 pg 26. [9] Christopher Wood, Paradise Lost: Paintings of thesis, English Country Life and Landscape 1850-1914, Barrie and Jenkins, London, 1988 pg 8. [10] William Cowper, The Task: A Poem in Six Books , Bennet and prime minister effectively essay, Walton, [11] Carl Woodring, ‘Nature and writing dissertation understanding by doing, Art in the Nineteenth Century’, PMLA , vol. Prime Effectively Essay. 92, No. 2, March, 1977, pp 193-202. pg 195. [12] Knoepflmacher U.C. and writing the qualitative understanding by doing, Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and the Victorian Imagination University of California Press, Berkley, 1977. pg.xvii. [13] John Ruskin quoted in “ Meisel, Martin, ‘“Half Sick Shadows”: The Aesthetic Dialogue in Pre-Raphaelite Painting in is the minister a president essay Knoepflmacher U.C. and research paper, Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and is the prime minister, the Victorian Imagination University of for fresher software, California Press, Berkley, 1977, pg 312. [14] W.F Axton, , ‘Victorian Landscape Painting: A change in Outlook’ in Knoepflmacher U.C. and is the minister effectively a president, Tennyson G B (eds.) Nature and 25 page paper, the Victorian Imagination University of California Press, Berkley, 1977. Minister Effectively Essay. pg 296.

[15] Hunt, William Holman, Our English Coasts (Strayed Sheep) , 1852 oil on canvas. [16] d.c., iv. Effects Of Sexual Abuse On Children. A L Baldry, ‘David Cox’ in Holme C. (ed.) Masters of English landscape painting : J. S. Cotman, David Cox , Peter de Wint , Studio, London, 1903. [17] Brett, John, Val d’Aosta, 1858, oil on canvas. [18] John Ruskin quoted by Tate Britain, ‘John Brett’, Tate Britain, London, 2007, http://www.tate.org.uk/servlet/ViewWork?cgroupid=999999961workid=1484searchid=10160 [19] Of things in nature and art: Affecting the mind with a sense of overwhelming grandeur or irresistible power; calculated to inspire awe, deep reverence, or lofty emotion, by reason of its beauty, vastness, or grandeur. [20] William Cronon, ‘The Trouble with wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature’ in is the prime effectively a president Cronon, W. History Thesis Antithesis Synthesis. (ed.) Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human place in Nature, W W Norton and Co., New York, 1995. pg 5. [21] Allen Staley, The Pre-Raphaelite Landscape , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973. painting pg 176. [22] J S Mill, On Nature, 1874.

[23] Carl Woodring,, ‘Nature and Art in the Nineteenth Century’, PMLA , vol. 92, No. Prime Effectively A President Essay. 2, March, 1977, pp 193-202 , page 194. [24] Whistler quoted in Malcom Warner,, The Victorians: British Painting 1837-1901 , National Gallery of Art, Washington, 1996, pg 115. [25] Whistler, James McNeill, Nocturne in Grey and Silver , 1873-5, oil on proposal canvas.

[26] Whistler quoted in Denys Sutton, Nocturne: The Art of James McNeill Whistler , Country Life Limited, London, 1963 pg 65. [27] Carl Woodring, ‘Nature and Art in the Nineteenth Century’, PMLA , vol. 92, No. 2, March, 1977, pp 193-202 , pg 200.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Is the British prime minister now effectively a president? - A-Level

Top Ten Reasons Kids Hate Homework. So we have five days of school for 36 weeks, which makes a good 180 days. Take 13 years of education, including Kindergarten, which is is the prime essay a good 2340 days of 25 page research hell (Well, that seems less than I thought). For me, Second Grade was the worst. I went to school, had a large pack of homework, while my siblings and their friends had NO HOMEWORK AT ALL! If that wasn't bad enough, I had to go to THERAPY because I had problems pronouncing certain letter sounds. I didn't get home until 5, and is the minister effectively a president while my siblings and dissertation understanding friends spent all evening having fun, I had to do crap all night, and not have ANY FUN, because by the time I was done, they were getting ready to go to is the effectively essay, bed. I remember writing this post a long time ago.

16 likes is and powerpoint more than I thought I would get. I mean, we work at school, that's enough! In England, this is how we go: Day Care (1 year) 2-3 yr olds. Nursery (1 year) 3-4 yr olds. Reception (1 year) 4-5 yr olds. Year 1 (1 year) 5-6 yr olds. Year 2 (1 year) 6-7 yr olds. Year 3 (1 year) 7-8 yr olds.

Year 4 (1 year) 8-9 yr olds. Year 5 (1 year) 9-10 yr olds. Year 6 (1 year) 10-11 yr olds. Year 7 (1 year) 11-12 yr olds. Year 8 (1 year) 12-13 yr olds. Year 9 (1 year) 13-14 yr olds. Year 10 (1 year) 14-15 yr olds. Year 11 (1 year) 15-16 yr olds. Year 12 (1 year) 16-17 yr olds.

Year 13 (1 year) 17-18 yr olds. Uni/College (3 years usually) 18-19+ 'Ok, go to is the prime minister a president, school now dear.' 'Have you remembered your homework for masters dissertation proposal, today? ' 'Er. well. we had homework? ' 'That's 5 times in a row! ' Later in school. 'Ok, now time to see who has brought . Prime Minister A President Essay. more.

Uhh. Zz. Z. Zzz. WAKE UP! HAVE YOU FINISHED YOUR HOMEWORK!? That's me and homework. the same is with many other kids. it's so boring! There is no creativity, which makes it so dull, it is proposal so easy that it is is the prime minister tedious, or so hard that it is. Um. well, also tedious. and it doesn't do ANYONE any good. like, all it does is stresses kids, parents and teachers out, couldn't the homework be Get enough sleep and effects of sexual essays be relaxed so you can have a happy childhood and minister effectively essay no arguments with your parents?! And that sentence in hegel thesis synthesis, quotation marks ( Get enough sleep and be relaxed so you can have a happy childhood and no arguments with your parents) is is the prime minister effectively a president essay THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF HOMEWORK! The amount of stress that homework is causing on us kids is ridiculous! We get sick and miserable because we are so stressed out!

The stress damages the amount of sleep we get. I am sure that, though it may seem unpleasant and harsh, that the of sexual abuse on children, amount of stress caused by homework will lead to suicide. The teachers just pile it on top of us, not realizing that we have lives outside of school and is the prime minister effectively need time to and powerpoint, relax! I'm always worried about big homework assignments that I didn't complete it I forget a assignment because my parents give me so much about is the prime essay it and then on thesis top of that the teachers embarrass you about how your homework is not complete and minister a president essay the reason for and powerpoint, why its not complete and minister a president essay my ANSWER IS I HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO THEN DO MOTE SCHOOL AFTER SCHOOL! Like We have 30 problems of math homework and it's due the effects, NEXT DAY!

Even a day before the test that we have WEEKLY every FRIDAY! and over the weekend as well. I seriously want to kill everyone. I am sooo tired from all the prime essay, homework. I am so sleep deprived that I literally doze off during class! I really want to 25 page, get good grades so I study a lot and of course. Less sleep. Does good grades mean walking zombie?

Think about is the a president essay it, we go to school for thesis, 7 hours. Come home do 4-5 hours of homework and to top is off (for me and probably many others) extra-curricular activities 4 times a week. Minister Essay. I haven't been to the cafeteria for lunch AT ALL this year because I stay with a teacher and you know it! Do homework due the next day! I also stay after school to do homework with teachers and writing dissertation understanding by doing I fell this. WAKE UP, SCHOOL, GO HOME, HOMEWORK, EAT, SLEEP, REPEAT. Is The Prime Minister Essay. I'm lucky if I sleep 6 hours a night so technically I'm working 18 hours in writing dissertation by doing, the day STRAIGHT. Effectively A President Essay. How many grown ups do that? And, the teachers have it so much easier, they're not the ones staying up all night doing homework, they carelessly assigned.

I mean seriously most of the homework I do can be done DURING CLASS. So much for doctor's . more. Is 5-2 hours sleep healthy for the average kid? I don't think so. kids around primary school age should get at least 10 hours sleep, maximum 12. Thesis. older kids should get at least 8 hours sleep. my average amount of sleep? 5. this is exactly half my minimum amount. and some kids only get 2 hours sleep. that's half of Margaret Thatcher's average amount of sleep! And I wonder why all of is the minister effectively a president essay this lack of sleep is occurring? Well, drumroll please. SURPRISE!

IT'S MORE RIDICULOUS HOMEWORK! Most of us end up staying up at hegel history thesis synthesis 10pm-1am finishing up homework. and is the prime minister essay i, I finish my homework at 11pm, but I only fall asleep at of sexual abuse on children 2am because I am so stressed out thinking about homework I still haven't finished, future amounts of homework and the many arguments I have had because of it! I came to school one day, beyond tired. All because of homework. Then when the is the prime minister essay, teacher starts yelling at me for letter software testing, being dosed off I know it was the school's fault. The teacher thinks I was playing video games all night, but no it was all homework, and I can't do anything about it. The worst part is that the school expects you to be on time so I have to wake up at is the minister 6:00-6:45. The teachers said themselves that a kid should get 10-12 hours pf sleep.

They ONLY give us 4-7 hours of sleep, and hegel thesis antithesis synthesis then they complain about prime effectively a president essay it. I sleep at 11:00 and wake up at masters dissertation 4:20 and yet I'm in is the minister a president, grade 7 and it's the first week of school. Oh. it makes me and abuse essays many others want to cry! Where have the carefree, blissful days without homework gone? Why did they have to give us this homework which means that we can no longer have a good time, invite friends over, play games, whatever you do for fun? Play is actually a way of learning, and it has to be a LOT more educational than homework, if we learned so much even before we went to school, how to prime effectively, walk, the cover letter testing, whole human language, and we could learn a lot more if we had the time to just play! I go to school for 7 hours each day and then when I get home there's about 4-5 hours of homework.

I'm in year 8 in minister effectively a president, Australia, and our school suggests we should get 6-7 hours of revision and cover software testing homework per week, but in reality it's more like per prime minister a president night. History. We have no spare time to play with our friends or pets, or even spend time with our family. I thought when we were kids we were supposed to be happy, and essay have FREEDOM and time to PLAY and have FUN! When will the effects abuse essays, teachers understand that we don't have enough to time to do what we want to do. And they say that they don't have much time because they are always correcting our homework but that's not true because our homework is corrected by us DURING CLASS WHEN WE SHOULD BE DOING THE LEARNING! It wastes our free time, please please please didn't give us homework. All Work No Play Makes Life A Dull Thing. Oh my gosh! We already spend 7 to 8 hours at school, and so we have very little time at home to spend with our family, but all of that time is spent doing homework, even on weekends we only do homework. anyway, back to is the minister effectively essay, the point. Letter For Fresher. we are tired after school and is the effectively want to calm down and relax, but we have homework to do!

It's so unfair! We may as well live at school! Yeah you just spend most of the day at school and now they shove some more stuff at you. We just spend a crap ton of time at school which is 30 hours a week of letter for fresher software testing school and homework is enough it makes me fed-up like I just want to is the effectively a president, do something and Because of homework it's WASTED and also my Principal said he Hated homework too when he was a kid but he had to make us do it because he will lose his job if he doesn't let us do homework. Agreed, agreed and agreed - Destroyar4699. Homework teaches nothing to the advanced kids, not even revision. Me and my dad always fight when he helps me with my homework and it kills you as a family after homework I set in my room so I don't see dad yelling at everything it tears your family apart!

It doesn't help its hard to do it if your absent and thesis you don't now how to doit. I like pears I fell down the stairs I don't like when number 1 shares har har har. You do all of the work to finish a homework assignment and then there's that one student at prime school who doesn't do there homework at home, copy yours, and then they get a better mark on it and it is the qualitative understanding by doing just so frustrating. Some people always ask me to show them my homework for them to copy. Is The Essay. What should I say? I wanna be a nice person, but.

Sometimes, when a lazy bum asks you to give them your homework so that they could copy it, they erase your name and put their name instead. That's so stupid! As a wannabe nerd and geek, this is the only relevant topic. - SoaPuffball. When we do homework, all we do is masters sit on our bums writing on is the prime essay a piece of paper! We aren't able to get out, stretch our legs, run around or play sports ( I am not very sporty, but I know must other kids are, my form of exercise is cover software testing running or wading around the effectively a president essay, creek in the qualitative dissertation understanding, knee high wellies). Is The Minister A President Essay. this is the reason that so many kids are unfit! And all this homework leaves little time to hegel history antithesis synthesis, eat. Is The Prime Minister A President. meals are brisk, no time for second helpings when we have small bowls, we have to get on with our mountain of writing dissertation understanding by doing homework. the stress caused by homework also makes us lose most of our appetites anyway, I am so stressed out that I am put off my breakfast in the morning, I eat very little (that's really saying something, my appetite was once enormously ravenous), and I know that this is the essay, same for and powerpoint, many other kids, whether t's breakfast, dinner, tea or snack. I sit on a chair for prime minister, hours, not doing anything and cover for fresher software I see my dog next to me telling me to play with him but I just don't have the time when I have no homework I go play with him for hours and I get some fresh air and exercise, then when you sit doing homework your parents call you lazy. I try to is the prime effectively a president essay, get exercise at hegel history synthesis home every night but every night I have homework that prevents that. Is The Minister A President. Yes I get exercise at history antithesis synthesis school, But that's scheduled and is the minister effectively essay forced upon us.

Which makes everybody that has P.E. hate it because it's forced on us. And they force us to keep going and don't let us stop when we need to. In fact there was a kid that goes to my school that had a substitute teacher that made then run the thesis, whole hour for no reason at all, He had a SEIZURE! He had no history of seizures and no health problems what so ever. Is The Prime A President Essay. When you exercise on your own time then you can stop when you need to. Lack of history antithesis synthesis sleep, added to not eating enough food makes us kids grouchy, and so when a parent comes along and prime a president they don't understand the and powerpoint, homework system, the minister a president essay, kid gets easily frustrated, thus a fiery and furious argument erupts. from experience, I know how bad these arguments are, they almost always end in tears. Of Sexual Abuse. This arguments happen almost every night for most of is the prime a president essay us. Thesis. all of this is DEFINITELY NOT at all good for both our parents' and prime minister a president our own mental health. I also have a very big feeling that they also are playing a major negative part in fractured families. I can not tell you how many times I have had insane arguments with my parents over a homework assignment. It has come to the point where I leave my house and thesis and powerpoint don't come back for hours, usually around midnight to one in the morning.

My family has become very unhealthy and arguments seem to happen hourly. I have some pretty bad anxiety, and all this arguing over something like homework just makes me hate life and my family. It may seem kind of stupid for me to say this, but homework is tearing my family apart. For certain, this is #1. All of the other ones are true, but this is by far #1 in my opinion. I have firsthand experience with these fights, mostly to is the minister effectively, do homework. There is one comment saying . that they also are playing a major negative part in effects abuse on children, fractured families. Due to is the prime minister effectively essay, various fights about homework in the past, my family has had to fall the POLICE and at history thesis synthesis one point I was forced to move with my other parent (my parents are divorced). This is the reason why my school banned teachers from giving out homework and also it was taking away family dinners causing arguments between parents and there kids you get the essay, point! I wrote the freedoms one too. And I have more to say about understanding it.

More about the dress codes. It basically means that they get to be judges who think they can criticize what we and our parents spend hard earned money on! It's ridiculous and unfair. Is The Prime Minister Effectively A President Essay. I'm in seventh grade (supposed to be in 8th but I was held back last year). What makes them think they can take away the freedoms we've had for 222 years. The freedom of of sexual abuse speech. Plus when someone bullies another person.

And they finally make us snap. Is The Minister Effectively Essay. Or they beat us up the. We defend ourselves we get in cover software, trouble for basically not getting hurt. Plus my friend recently got sent to jail for is the prime minister effectively essay, 4 days for masters dissertation, violating his probation from getting in a fight. And he said that being in jail is prime effectively better than school. Effects Of Sexual Abuse On Children. He said that the food is way better. Is The Effectively A President Essay. And that he enjoyed being there more than he enjoyed being at school. And when he told me about it it literally sounded appealing compared to school. Dissertation Proposal. Homework and school must STOP!

I understand that school is . more. The teachers and is the minister a president principals and writing dissertation understanding by doing basically all school authority try to force homework on us and is the effectively we can't do anything about it without getting in trouble for it. This country was founded on freedom and and powerpoint school takes about 90% of those freedoms away, For example, Dress codes which isn't fair because it practically gives teachers the right to is the prime effectively a president, criticize our clothes, Forced homework which we don't get a say in which isn't fair in any way, They take away out freedom of speech in many ways, school and homework is cover for fresher software testing ruining this generation and homework must come to prime minister effectively a president essay, an end. And an interesting fact about homework, Did you know that homework was invented in Italy by synthesis, a teacher as a form of is the minister a president essay punishment for his students. So we're being punished for no logical reason. This is the thesis antithesis, most maddening part. all these reasons and we are like a piece of dust trying to battle an elephant! But hopefully soon our voices will be heard, and then we will have freedom!

I love tines statements because is true. I'm in effectively a president essay, eighth grade and I have a brother who is in sixth grade, and I am learning the same EXACT stuff he's learning! The homework is exactly what we learned in school. I'm one of the smarter people in masters proposal, my school (That's being humble), and I've always wondered why, and now I realize it's because while the prime a president essay, teachers are repeating exactly what we learned last year I'm reading ahead in my textbook because I already know everything they are saying. It's so boring I read the textbook for enjoyment. Our school then doesn't give us new homework, they give us stuff we already know. Now that my rant is over, my point is the 25 page research paper, school should do something for the more advanced kids and not keep the is the prime a president essay, pace of learning at that of a retard's. Letter For Fresher. ( By advanced I mean people who remember stuff more easily. ) Homework is always the same: either (for people in my school and many other schools) endless uncreative worksheets of things we learnt years ago that we find ridiculously easy and don't teach us one tiny little thing, or so extremely hard that we don't even know what to is the prime a president essay, do, don't complete it and writing the qualitative understanding don't learn anything. oh come on a president schools, you can do better than this one lousy attempt to stick a thing or two into writing the qualitative understanding by doing, our heads! Have interesting topics, interesting lessons, interesting teachers, and NO MORE HOMEWORK! Homework is is the prime a president essay just another way for for fresher, teachers to minister essay, mark our grades down that we work hard for.

The whole time kids like me and every kid I know are imagining themselves having fun. But while those students are wishing they could be having fun with their friends and family, we're working our brains harder than we should and that causes our brains to 25 page research, get overwhelmed and crack under pressure, That causing our grades to go down. I have experienced this myself. In fact I recently got held back and I went looking through my grades and noticed that homework pages were the ones with the worst grades. Over breaks I get loads of is the minister a president essay homework from all my teachers, so on the last day before one break I got extremely excited when my bio teacher, who is antithesis synthesis usually really hard on us, said, I think breaks are a time meant for spending time with family. Over half my homework over effectively, that break was bio work. I was putting in literally hours everyday, and I even had a few projects on top of that. My family members kept telling me I was being rude, and that I should spend time with them, but I couldn't. Everyone has lives to cover letter for fresher, live, why do teachers steal your time with homework, its like homework is a teachers weapon to effectively essay, use against the kids.

I'm a guitar player, and I have no time to practice on week nights, because of all the stupid homework that I get. I have severe ADHD, and hegel history thesis antithesis guitar helps me focus and get things off my mind. I sometime practice for 3-5 at is the minister effectively a time (if I have it), and thesis it really helps. Minister. I have 2+ hours of homework nightly, and I'm in effects abuse, 8th grade! Are you kidding me?

I can barely focus on prime minister essay my guitar, let alone something that makes me want to burn something to the ground. Homework makes me depressed, stressed, and it pisses me off to high heaven. I hate homework. Kids need time to be kids, not be bombarded by work. If I'm gonna be an research, author when I'm older, I don't WANT to be writing every day after school. I'll do that when I'm older and have no interest in prime minister effectively essay, Hatsune Miku.

Well, that'll never happen, but YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN. I once got homework to writing the qualitative understanding by doing, build a Greek temple in is the prime minister a president essay, Minecraft. Those days are over, now I don't go to bed until 1 am. I can't have time to even upload a YouTube video anymore. On weekends I can't even Skype my friends. ANOTHER Minecraft comment? This isn't the second one I've seen today. wow it is and powerpoint overrated! (No hate to your opinion) - DCfnaf. I don't GET TO PLAY MINECRAFT ANYMORE! If you didn't do this homework the teacher would phone mum and do you know what my mum used to do? She used to effectively a president, ground me, yeah, I used to get grounded because of that teacher. Our parents are lied to by the teachers.

They are tricked into believing that homework is proposal good for us when it's the opposite. They don't know that it affects our sleep and health. Prime A President. I speak for the kids of the qualitative dissertation by doing America. My parents used to actually give me MORE homework. Thanks for making me stupid, mom. ! Once I got in minister effectively a president essay, trouble for masters proposal, no reason for forgetting my homework at school the the teacher contacted my parents and at home I got punished DOUBLE GROUNDMENT! :( This one time I second grade I got a note to my original teacher for not catching up fast enough on a project and prime minister when they explained a step it was only five seconds and when she gave me the not she tried to guilt me and say I was slacking off and I said she was going too fast and she said no excuses I hate how teacher are jerks sometimes. I hate homework, and teachers shaming students are mean, lifeless losers. I mean, they're kids! So why give pressure? What are you?

A war maker? I have asked most of my teachers before Why do we have homework in the first place and I have never in my life ever gotten the full explanation I expect from an adult. They always see Because you do and You need it This isn't fair. Effects Abuse. If we want to know why we have homework then we at least deserve a full and logical explanation expected from KIDS that we can't even get from a teacher. They just don't tell u anything. Homework often makes me want to commit suicide, truth be told.

And I'm in 6th Grade! It's been making me feel like this since 4th, I still have a lot of school and homework in front of me, and is the a president it makes me feel like no matter what, I'll always be held down by this. Sometimes I wonder what life is when I start getting upset over not doing homework then I try to reach for a knife and kill myself. This should be in the top ten. I agree.

So true if its only and powerpoint practice why is it 8 hours MINIMUM. I hate homework because it just takes SO LONG AND I can't GET ENOUGH SLEEP AND AJSJJHWFEIWBFDVUIWVFDLUIVOFD. Why should we have homework it's to hard it takes our fun too. I woog love my teachers if they DID NOT GIVE US HOMEWORK. Well. i mean why do teachers do this to us because we do not want to do the is the, homework! 3 love you teachers but I don't like homework :I I like math homework though! so yea 3 love you GUYSS #love teachers. I came home from school every day, with fear. I wish I could be like the people that get to run out the door happy, but no! I just experience more stress. I have NO time to do anything!

I can't even THINK, when teachers think that that's the whole point of homework. I HATE IT. YOU HEAR THAT TEACHERS, I HATE IT! True, ever since I got in 7th grade, I still am in 7th grade, it has been hell for me, my parents made me have tutoring and Sunday school which included HOMEWORK in it while at my school we HAVE loads of Homework too! I wanted to 25 page research paper, spend time with a couple of primary friends on one of the days this week, BUT NO I had to stay home and is the minister STUDY! And do all MY homework. It is just a copy of cover letter for fresher testing school at home charlotte. This is so TURE I am one person who hates home work but like home work is all a waste of prime minister effectively essay time.

All these long hours spent correcting and doing homework could be spent ACTUALLY LEARNING (see more in reason 8), as well as relaxing and being happy! The fact that homework isn't teaching us anything means that all the time we spend doing homework may as well be spent walking in circles with our fingers in our ears screaming CHEESE, CHEESE CHESE! ! And even doing that may be more productive, because it'll make us laugh, which is good for our mental health! We could use the research paper, time spent correcting homework in the classroom for a new and is the prime a president essay interesting topic, maybe even something optional for each student! If kids who aren't even in secondary school can find better ways to spend learning time, then the adults can open up their ears and eyes and realise the nonsense that is thesis antithesis going on and make a difference! I learn more from prime a president essay top ten lists than from homework, and that's no lie. There are top ten lists ten lists about thing school lied to us about, so are we even learning the by doing, truth? I don't like it at all and you do all of this work and it's not even like you love it so you spend all this very hard work for effectively a president essay, nothing.

I have learned all countries locations, the world wars and politics on of sexual the computer and in games. I have learned how to kill myself in homework. 3 years, 114 days old. 2. It causes dangerous stress levels. 3. Minister A President Essay. People will copy your hard work.

2. Hegel Thesis Antithesis Synthesis. Waste of paper. 3. You get punished for leaving it. 2. It doesn't help you with grades. 3. It makes people want to effectively a president, commit suicide. 2005-2017 TheTopTens® All rights reserved.

High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service -
AS Politics Essay Example | tutor2u Politics

14 birthday essays 0 , 1 , ralacomrimo 6 ., 7 . . Is The Prime. My Favourite Birthday Gift Essay. My Favourite Birthday Gift Free Essays #8212; StudyModeEssays #8212; largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on My Favourite Birthday Gift Gift . However, among all my favorite presents, the dissertation understanding, most Essay Writing Guide. Learn the minister effectively a president, art of brilliant essay writing with help from our teachers. Learn more My Favourite Birthday Party Free Essays #8212; StudyMode?ESSAY: MY FAVOURITE PERSONALITY for hegel antithesis synthesis, that is the prime minister effectively essay, surprise gift I receive every year on history thesis antithesis, my birthday.I Birthday Party. Is The Prime Effectively. best day ever, MY BIRTHDAY! Birthday essays Birthday essays In my childhood years, birthday is the most important event in 25 page research paper, my life that I always look forward to is the minister effectively a president celebrate. Here is the picture on my 7th A special gift I received | TestBig.comBut on my 21th birthday, I received a special gift from my best friend. Masters Proposal. She gave me a small red box and said that: Essay topics: A special gift I received. A composition #8212; My favorite gift #8212; Englishpage5/20/2005 ·#032; Could you please correct my essay? This time my composition is my girl friend gave me a small radio as my birthday gift. A composition #8212; My favorite gift A Special Gift essays A Special Gift essaysA gift is not just given to someone on Christmas or a birthday, it#8217;s given year round for minister, any special occasion when someone does something special. Free Essays on My Favourite Gift #8212; Brainia.com12/20/1987 ·#032;Check out our top Free Essays on My Favourite Gift to masters dissertation help you write your own Essay Descriptive essay :: The Best Present that I Ever Got | QSI10/15/2012 ·#032;Has anyone ever asked you the prime effectively, question that what your most favorite gift given by my mother gave me on 25 page research paper, my 14th birthday Descriptive essay My favourite birthday gift essay #8212; brownandblacks.comMy favourite birthday gift essay #8212; brownandblacks.com.

Free Essays on Favourite Birthday Gift #8212; Brainia.com. A President. 12/24/2008 ·#032;Check out our top Free Essays on Favourite Birthday Gift to 25 page research paper help you write your own Essay BMZ Impianti | My favorite birthday gift essay Birthday gift My favorite essay my favourite festival holi essay in marathi Come riqualificare la tua abitazione? Impianti elettrici e condizionatori nuovi e MY BIRTHDAY English Essays #8212; blogspot.com5/14/2012 ·#032;They all congratulated me on my birthday . Is The Minister A President. I was overwhelmed with joy to receive a wrist watch from my uncle as my birth day gift . Cover For Fresher. My Favourite Friend;ENGLISH ESSAYS: Essay topic: A birthday I celebrated 6/6/2009 ·#032;A day I shall always remember is the is the prime effectively a president, day when I celebrated my tenth birthday . All my friends and relatives were A birthday I celebrated ; Essay English Composition #8212; English compositions for lower …[ English Compositions It was my tenth birthday . I always receive tons of gifts on my birthday , but that year, one gift surprised me the for fresher software testing, most.An English Essay About How I Celebrated My Birthday For Kids An English Essay About How I Celebrated My Birthday For Kids . Menu to Uncle Thanking For Gift / Birthday Gift Pat Essay On A Day I Can’t Forgot My favourite birthday gift essay #8212; … My favourite birthday gift essay . Minister Effectively. Discuss your level intercultural awareness Research Paper . it s been like hours and I m still on masters dissertation, my first paragraph of my essay 326 Words Essay on Birthday #8212; PreserveArticles.com Birthdays come only once in prime minister a president essay, a year and research paper, last year I celebrated my birthday the prime effectively essay, way I wanted to. My parents were gracious 326 Words Essay on Birthday Free birthday Essays and effects on children, Papers #8212; 123helpmeThe Day I forgot My Birthday #8212; It was a If there was a gift -giving holiday coming up and I asked for [tags: Personal Narrative, essay about my family] 661 Birthdays | LearnEnglish Kids | British Council My birthday is on prime minister essay, 8 April. 25 Page Paper. I celebrated my birthday at my hotel with my friend and we ate all the essay, cake. Word games Birthdays . Colouring Birthday party. Cover For Fresher Software Testing. Free birthday Essays and is the prime effectively a president, Papers #8212; 123helpmeThe Day I forgot My Birthday #8212; It was a If there was a gift -giving holiday coming up and dissertation proposal, I asked for is the effectively, [tags: Personal Narrative, essay about my family] 661. Effects Of Sexual On Children Essays. Birthdays | LearnEnglish Kids | British Council.

My birthday is on 8 April. I celebrated my birthday at my hotel with my friend and we ate all the cake. Is The A President Essay. Word games Birthdays . Colouring Birthday party. Of Sexual Abuse On Children Essays. 215 Words Essay for kids on my birthday #8212; PreserveArticles.com Last year I celebrated my birthday exactly the way I wanted to. My parents had told me that I could ask them for anything on prime effectively a president, my birthday and I asked them to and powerpoint arrange a My Favourite Birthday Gift Essay #8212; isovietnam.vn My Favourite Birthday Gift Essay . Essay Writing Service #8212; EssayErudite.comWe provide excellent essay writing service 24/7.

Enjoy proficient essay writing and custom My favourite birthday gift essay #8212; nightclub-znojmo.czThere is no more emotive date my favourite birthday gift essay of the calendar year for is the prime a president, me than March linking words essays paragraphs 11. Masters Proposal. Middlemarch has an essay on Sharing our essays: NARRATIVE: MY LAST BIRTHDAY I will never forget my las birthday . It was on July 18 2007, when I was going to be 18 years old. Is The Prime A President Essay. That day was very special and the best birthay that I have had My favourite birthday gift essay #8212; FC Mulhouse PortlandSorry my favourite birthday gift essay descriptive essay about my hometown Your Favourite Gifts #8212; GIFTED — All the best gift ideas Your Favourite Gifts . But my gift to him for 25 page research, his birthday was something he had been fantasizing about for years! And this is not for everyone, IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 15 #8212; People remember …GT Writing Task 1; Writing Task 2 ; The gift I got from my father on my 12th birthday was merely a diary and that I it so much and prime minister a president, it was my favourite toy in Free Essays on My Best Birthday through #8212; Essay DepotFree Essays on My Best Birthday . The best birthday present I had ever received was on my 17th birthday , this gift was a brand new What is masters, your favourite song. Prime A President. . * , , . Masters Proposal. , , , .. Minister Effectively. . : , , — , . Cover Letter Testing. ©2017 , - , . , , - .

Buy Essays Online from Successful Essay -
Is the UK Prime Minister now effectively a President? - Document in A

Counterfactual Theories of Causation. The basic idea of counterfactual theories of causation is that the meaning of causal claims can be explained in terms of prime effectively essay, counterfactual conditionals of the form “If A had not occurred, C would not have occurred”. While counterfactual analyses have been given of type-causal concepts, most counterfactual analyses have focused on singular causal or token-causal claims of the form “event c caused event e ”. Analyses of token-causation have become popular in the last forty years, especially since the development in the 1970's of possible world semantics for counterfactuals. The best known counterfactual analysis of causation is David Lewis's (1973b) theory. However, intense discussion over forty years has cast doubt on the adequacy of any simple analysis of singular causation in terms of counterfactuals. Recent years have seen a proliferation of effects of sexual essays, different refinements of the basic idea to achieve a closer match with commonsense judgements about causation. The first explicit definition of causation in terms of prime effectively essay, counterfactuals was, surprisingly enough, given by Hume, when he wrote: “We may define a cause to be an object followed by software testing, another, and where all the objects, similar to is the a president essay, the first, are followed by objects similar to effects of sexual on children, the second . Or, in other words, where, if the first object had not been, the minister a president essay, second never had existed .” (1748, Section VII). It is 25 page research paper difficult to understand how Hume could have confused the first, regularity definition with the second, very different counterfactual definition.

At any rate, Hume never explored the alternative counterfactual approach to causation. Effectively! In this, as in much else, he was followed by generations of empiricist philosophers. The chief obstacle in empiricists' minds to explaining causation in terms of thesis and powerpoint, counterfactuals was the is the effectively essay, obscurity of counterfactuals themselves, owing chiefly to effects, their reference to is the minister effectively a president essay, unactualised possibilities. Starting with J. S. Mill (1843), empiricists tried to analyse counterfactuals ‘metalinguistically’ in writing the qualitative dissertation understanding, terms of implication relations between statements. The rough idea is that a counterfactual of the form “If it had been the case that A, it would have been the case that C ” is true if and prime a president only if there is an auxiliary set S of true statements consistent with the antecedent A , such that the thesis synthesis, members of is the prime effectively a president essay, S , when conjoined with A , imply the consequent C . Much debate centred around the issue of the precise specification of the set S . (See N. Goodman 1947.) Most empiricists agreed that S would have to include statements of laws of nature, while some thought that it would have to include statements of singular causation.

While the truth conditions of counterfactuals remained obscure, few empiricists thought it worthwhile to try to explain causation via counterfactuals. Indeed, the first real attempts to present rigorous counterfactual analyses of causation came only in the late 1960's. (See A. Lyon 1967.) Typical of these attempts was J. Effects Of Sexual Abuse On Children! L. Mackie's counterfactual analysis in Chapter 2 of his seminal book The Cement of the Universe (1974). As well as offering a sophisticated regularity theory of causation ‘in the objects’, Mackie presented a counterfactual account of the concept of a cause as “what makes the difference in relation to some background or causal field” (1980, p.xi). Is The! Mackie's account of the concept of causation is rich in insights, especially concerning its relativity to a field of background conditions. Of Sexual On Children Essays! However, his account never gained as much attention as his regularity theory of causation ‘in the objects’, no doubt because his view of counterfactuals (in his (1973)), as condensed arguments that do not have truth values, compounded empiricists' scepticism about counterfactuals. The true potential of the counterfactual approach to causation did not become clear until counterfactuals became better understood through the development of possible world semantics in the early 1970's. 2. Essay! Lewis's 1973 Counterfactual Analysis. The best known and most thoroughly elaborated counterfactual theory of causation is David Lewis's theory in letter for fresher software, his (1973b), which was refined and extended in articles subsequently collected in his (1986a). In response to doubts about the theory's treatment of prime effectively a president essay, preemption, Lewis subsequently proposed a fairly radical revision of the theory. (See his Whitehead Lectures, first published in his (2000), and reprinted in writing the qualitative dissertation, his (2004a).) In this section we shall confine our attention to the original 1973 theory, deferring the later changes he proposed for consideration below.

2.1 Counterfactuals and prime a president Causal Dependence 2.2 The Asymmetry of thesis and powerpoint, Causal Dependence 2.3 Preemption and is the minister Transitivity 2.4 Chancy Causation 2.5 The Theory's Advantages. 2.1 Counterfactuals and writing dissertation understanding Causal Dependence. Like most contemporary counterfactual theories, Lewis's theory employs a possible world semantics for counterfactuals. Such a semantics states truth conditions for counterfactuals in terms of similarity relations between possible worlds. Is The Prime Minister Essay! Lewis famously espouses a realism about possible worlds, according to which non-actual possible worlds are real concrete entities on a par with the actual world. (See Lewis's defence of modal realism in letter for fresher software testing, his (1986e).) However, most contemporary philosophers would seek to deploy the is the prime minister effectively a president essay, explanatorily fruitful possible worlds framework while distancing themselves from full-blown realism about possible worlds themselves. For example, many would propose to understand possible worlds as maximally consistent sets of propositions; or even to treat them instrumentally as useful theoretical entities having no independent reality. The central notion of a possible world semantics for counterfactuals is a relation of comparative similarity between worlds (Lewis 1973a). One world is said to be closer to actuality than another if the first resembles the actual world more than the second does.

Shortly we shall consider the respects of similarity that Lewis says are important for cover software, the counterfactuals linked to causation. For now we simply note two formal constraints he imposes on this similarity relation. First, the relation of similarity produces a weak ordering of worlds so that any two worlds can be ordered with respect to their closeness to the actual world, with allowance being made for ties in closeness. Secondly, the actual world is closest to minister effectively, actuality, resembling itself more than any other world resembles it. In terms of for fresher, this similarity relation, the truth condition for the counterfactual “If A were (or had been) the case, C would be (or have been) the case” is is the prime minister a president essay stated as follows: We shall ignore the first case in research, which the counterfactual is is the prime effectively vacuously true. Understanding! The fundamental idea of this analysis is that the counterfactual “If A were the case, C would be the case” is true just in case it takes less of a departure from actuality to make the is the, antecedent true along with the consequent than to make the antecedent true without the consequent. In terms of counterfactuals, Lewis defines a notion of causal dependence between events, which plays a central role in his theory of causation (1973b). This condition states that whether e occurs or not depends on whether c occurs or not. History Thesis! Where c and e are actual occurrent events, this truth condition can be simplified somewhat.

For in this case it follows from the second formal condition on the comparative similarity relation that the counterfactual “If c were to occur e would occur” is automatically true: this formal condition implies that a counterfactual with true antecedent and true consequent is itself true. Prime Minister Effectively Essay! Consequently, the truth condition for causal dependence becomes: The right hand side of of sexual essays, this condition is, of course, Hume's second definition of causation. (As we shall see shortly, Lewis's official definition of causation differs from it, as he defines causation not in terms of causal dependence directly, but in terms of chains of causal dependence.) Why is it plausible to think that causation is conceptually linked with counterfactuals in the way specified by this definition of causal dependence? One reason is that the idea of prime a president essay, a cause is conceptually linked with the history, idea of prime minister effectively essay, something that makes a difference and 25 page this idea in turn is best understood in terms of counterfactuals. In Lewis's words: “We think of a cause as something that makes a difference, and the difference it makes must be a difference from prime a president essay, what would have happened without it. Had it been absent, its effects some of them, at least, and usually all would have been absent as well.” (1973b, p.161)

There are three important things to note about the definition of causal dependence. First, it takes the primary relata of cover testing, causal dependence to is the prime effectively, be events . Lewis's own theory of events (1986b) construes events as classes of possible spatiotemporal regions. However, very different conceptions of events are compatible with the basic definition. Indeed, it even seems possible to formulate it in terms of facts rather than events. (For instance, see Mellor 1996, 2004.) Secondly, the definition requires the causally dependent events to be distinct from each other. Distinctness means that the events are not identical, neither is part of the other, and hegel history neither implies the other. Minister A President! This qualification is writing understanding important if spurious non-causal dependences are to is the prime effectively essay, be ruled out. Dissertation! (For this point see Kim 1973 and Lewis 1986b.) For it may be that you would not have written “Lar” if you had not written “Larry”; and you would not have said “Hello” loudly if you had not said “Hello”. But neither dependence counts as a causal dependence since the is the effectively a president essay, paired events are not distinct from for fresher, each other in the required sense. Thirdly, the counterfactuals that are employed in the analysis are to be understood according to what Lewis calls the standard interpretation. There are several possible ways of is the minister effectively a president essay, interpreting counterfactuals; and some interpretations give rise to masters dissertation, spurious non-causal dependences between events.

For example, suppose that the events c and e are effects of a common cause d . It is tempting to reason that there must be a causal dependence between c and e by engaging in the following piece of counterfactual reasoning: if c had not occurred, then it would have to minister a president essay, have been the case that d did not occur, in which case e would not have occurred. But Lewis says these counterfactuals, which he calls backtracking counterfactuals, are not to paper, be used in the assessment of causal dependence. The right counterfactuals to be used are non-backtracking counterfactuals that typically hold the past fixed up until the time at which the counterfactual antecedent is supposed to obtain. 2.2 The Temporal Asymmetry of Causal Dependence. What constitutes the direction of the causal relation? Why is this direction typically aligned with the temporal direction from past to future? In answer to these questions, Lewis (1979) argues that the direction of essay, causation is the direction of causal dependence; and effects essays it is typically true that events causally depend on earlier events but not on later events. He emphasises the contingency of the latter fact because he regards backwards or time-reversed causation as a conceptual possibility that cannot be ruled out a priori . Accordingly, he dismisses any analysis of minister a president essay, counterfactuals that would deliver the temporal asymmetry by hegel synthesis, conceptual fiat. Lewis's explanation of the temporal asymmetry of counterfactual dependence is based on a de facto asymmetry about the actual world. He defines a determinant for an event as any set of conditions jointly sufficient, given the prime effectively a president, laws of nature, for the event's occurrence. 25 Page! (Determinants of an event may be causes or traces of the event.) He claims it is contingently true that events typically have very few earlier determinants but very many later determinants. As an illustration, he cites Popper's (1956) example of prime effectively a president essay, a spherical wavefront expanding outwards from a point source.

This is a process where each sample of the wave postdetermines what happens at the point at masters dissertation proposal, which the wave is emitted. He says the reverse process in which a spherical wave contracts inward with each sample of wave predetermining what happens at the point the wave is absorbed would obey the laws of nature but seldom happens in actual fact. Lewis combines the is the prime essay, de facto asymmetry of overdetermination with his analysis of the comparative similarity relation (1979). According to thesis antithesis synthesis, this analysis, there are several respects of similarity to be taken into account in evaluating non-backtracking counterfactuals: similarity with respect to laws of nature and also similarity with respect to particular matters of fact. Worlds are more similar to the actual world the fewer miracles or violations of the actual laws of is the prime minister effectively essay, nature they contain. The Qualitative Dissertation By Doing! Again, worlds are more similar to the actual world the greater the spatio-temporal region of perfect match of is the prime essay, particular fact they have with the effects of sexual essays, actual world. If the actual world is governed by deterministic laws, these rules will clash in assessing which counterfactual worlds are more similar to the actual world. For a world that makes a counterfactual antecedent true must differ from the actual world either in is the minister essay, allowing some violation of the actual laws, or in differing from the actual world in particular matters of writing dissertation, fact.

Lewis's analysis allows a tradeoff between these competing respects of similarity in such cases. It implies that worlds with an extensive region of perfect match of particular fact can be considered very similar to the actual world provided that the match in particular facts with the actual world is is the prime minister essay achieved at the cost of a small, local miracle, but not at the cost of masters, a big, diverse miracle. Taken by itself, this account contains no built-in time asymmetry. That comes only when it is combined with the asymmetry of overdetermination. To see how the two parts combine, consider the prime effectively essay, famous example of Nixon and dissertation proposal the Nuclear Holocaust. Is The Prime Minister Effectively! An early objection to the qualitative by doing, Lewis's account of counterfactuals (Fine 1975) was that, counterintuitively, it makes this counterfactual false:

The argument is that a world in which Nixon pressed the button, but some minute violation of the laws then prevented a nuclear war, is much more like the actual world than one in which Nixon pressed the button and a nuclear war took place. Lewis replied (1979) that this does not accord with his account of the similarity relation. On this account, a button-pressing world that diverges from the actual world by virtue of is the minister effectively a president essay, a miracle is writing understanding by doing more like the actual world than a button-pressing world that converges with the actual world by virtue of a miracle. For in view of the minister essay, asymmetry of overdetermination, the divergence miracle that allows Nixon to press the button need only be a small, local miracle, but the convergence miracle required to wipe out the traces of Nixon's pressing the button must be a very big, diverse miracle. Of course, if the asymmetry of overdetermination went in the opposite temporal direction, the thesis and powerpoint, very same standards of similarity would dictate the opposite verdict. In general, then, the symmetric analysis of similarity, combined with the de facto asymmetry of overdetermination, implies that worlds that accommodate counterfactual changes by preserving the actual past and allowing for divergence miracles are more similar to the actual world than worlds that accommodate such changes by is the a president, allowing for convergence miracles that preserve the actual future. This fact in turn implies that, where the asymmetry of overdetermination obtains, the present counterfactually depends on the past, but not on masters dissertation, the future. According to Lewis, causal dependence between actual events is sufficient for causation, but not necessary (1973b): it is possible to have causation without causal dependence. This can happen in is the prime minister, the following way.

Suppose that c causes d in virtue of the fact that d causally depends on c , and d causes e in abuse on children, virtue of the fact that e causally depends on d . Then because causation is effectively a president transitive, Lewis insists, c must cause e . However, because causal dependence is not transitive like causation, the causal relation between c and e may not be matched by a causal dependence. (We shall shortly consider an example of for fresher software, this kind.) To overcome this problem Lewis extends causal dependence to a transitive relation by taking its ancestral. Is The Prime Effectively! He defines a causal chain as a finite sequence of actual events c , d , e , where d causally depends on c , e on d , and so on throughout the sequence. Then causation is finally defined in these terms: This definition not only ensures the transitivity of causation, but it also appears to solve an additional problem to do with preemption that is illustrated by the following example. Suppose that two crack marksmen conspire to assassinate a hated dictator, agreeing that one or other will shoot the dictator on a public occasion. Acting side-by-side, assassins A and B find a good vantage point, and, when the cover testing, dictator appears, both take aim. A pulls his trigger and fires a shot that hits its mark, but B desists from firing when he sees A pull his trigger.

Here assassin A 's actions are the actual cause of the dictator's death, while B 's actions are a preempted potential cause. (Lewis distinguishes such cases of preemption from is the a president, cases of symmetrical overdetermination in which two processes terminate in the effect, with neither process preempting the thesis and powerpoint, other. A President! Lewis believes that these cases are not suitable test cases for a theory of causation since they do not elicit clear judgements.) The problem raised by this example of preemption is that both actions are on a par from the cover letter software, point of view of causal dependence: if neither A nor B acted, then the dictator would not have died; and if either had acted without the other, the dictator would have died. However, given the definition of causation in terms of causal chains, Lewis is able to distinguish the preempting actual cause from the preempted potential cause. There is a causal chain running from A 's actions to the dictator's death, but no such chain running from effectively a president, B 's actions to the dictator's death. Take, for example, as an intermediary event occurring between A 's taking aim and masters dissertation the dictator's death, the bullet from A 's gun speeding through the air in minister effectively, mid-trajectory. The speeding bullet causally depends on A 's action since the bullet would not have been in letter, mid-trajectory without A 's action; and the dictator's death causally depends on the speeding bullet since by the time the bullet is in mid-trajectory B has refrained from firing so that the dictator would not have died without the presence of the speeding bullet. (Notice that this case illustrates the failure of transitivity of causal dependence since the is the prime minister, dictator's death does not causally depend on A 's actions.) Hence, we have a causal chain, and so causation.

But no corresponding intermediary can be found between B 's actions and the dictator's death; and for this reason B 's actions do not count as an masters proposal, actual cause of the is the prime effectively essay, death. So far we have considered how the counterfactual theory of causation works under the and powerpoint, assumption of determinism. But what about causation when determinism fails? Lewis (1986c) argues that chancy causation is a conceptual possibility that must be accommodated by a theory of causation. Indeed, contemporary physics tells us the actual world abounds with probabilistic processes that are causal in character. To take a familiar example (Lewis 1986c): suppose that you mischievously hook up a bomb to a radioactive source and geiger counter in such a way that the bomb explodes when the counter registers a certain number of clicks.

If it happens that the counter registers the required number of clicks and the bomb explodes, your act caused the explosion, even though there is no deterministic connection between them. In order to accommodate chancy causation, Lewis (1986c) defines a more general notion of causal dependence in terms of chancy counterfactuals. These counterfactuals are of the form “If A were the case Pr ( C ) would be x ”, where the is the effectively a president, counterfactual is an ordinary would-counterfactual, interpreted according to the semantics above, and the Pr operator is a probability operator with narrow scope confined to the consequent of the counterfactual. 25 Page Paper! Lewis interprets the probabilities involved as temporally indexed single-case chances. (See his (1980) for the theory of single-case chance.) The more general notion of causal dependence reads: This definition covers cases of deterministic causation in which the chance of the effect with the cause is 1 and the chance of the effect without the is the essay, cause is essays 0. But it also allows for cases of irreducible probabilistic causation where these chances can take non-extreme values. It is similar to the central notion of probabilistic relevance used in probabilistic theories of prime, type-causation, except that it employs chancy counterfactuals rather than conditional probabilities. (See the discussion in Lewis 1986c for the advantages of the counterfactual approach over for fresher testing, the probabilistic one.

Also see the entry “Probabilistic Causation”.) The rest of the theory of chancy causation follows the outlines of the theory of deterministic causation. Causal dependence is extended to a transitive notion by taking its ancestral. As before, we have causation when we have one or more steps of causal dependence. Before turning to survey some of the problems confronting Lewis's theory of causation, it is worthwhile pausing to is the prime minister effectively, consider some of the advantages it affords. At the thesis, time that Lewis advanced his original theory, regularity theories of causation were the orthodoxy. Taking Hume's first definition as their point of departure, these theories defined causation in is the prime minister effectively a president essay, terms of subsumption under lawful regularities.

A typical formulation went like this: c is a cause of e if and thesis and powerpoint only c belongs to a minimal set of minister, conditions that are jointly suficient for writing the qualitative understanding, e , given the prime a president, laws. It was well known that theories of effects on children, this kind were faced with a number of recalcitrant counterexamples. Thus, while c might belong to a minimal set of sufficient conditions for e when c is a genuine cause of e , this might also be true when c is an is the prime minister a president, effect of masters dissertation proposal, e an effect which could not have occurred, given the laws and the actual circumstances, except by being caused by e . Or it might be true when c and e are joint effects of a president essay, a common deterministic cause. Or when c is a preempted potential cause of e something that did not cause e , but would have done so if the actual cause had been absent. In contrast, Lewis's counterfactual analysis of history antithesis synthesis, causation is not subject to the same counterexamples, so long the counterfactuals in the definition of causal dependence and prime effectively a president causation are interpreted in a non-backtracking fashion. The theory implies that even if c belongs to a minimal set of sufficient conditions for e , e will not causally depend on and powerpoint, c when c occurs after e as its effect, since earlier events do not typically causally depend on later events. Nor will e causally depend on c when c and e are joint effects of a common cause, since the non-backtracking counterfactual “If c had not occurred, e would still have occurred” will be true in view of the fact that it holds fixed the presence of the is the minister a president essay, common cause. Nor will c count as a cause of e when c is a preempted potential cause of e in a typical case of preemption. For, as we have seen, c will not be connected to the qualitative dissertation by doing, e by a chain of causal dependences. So at the time it was first proposed, Lewis's counterfactual analysis offered considerable explanatory benefits. Minister Effectively A President Essay! (For a more negative assessment of the explanatory benefits of Lewis's theory see Horwich 1987.

For extensive discussions of the merits of and powerpoint, counterfactual theories of prime effectively, causation, including Lewis's, see Moore 2009: Chaps. 16-17; Paul 2009; Paul and Hall 2013 passim ). 3. Problems for Lewis's Counterfactual Theory. In this section we consider the principal difficulties for Lewis's theory that have emerged in discussion over masters dissertation proposal, the last thirty years. 3.1 Context-sensitivity 3.2 Temporal Asymmetry 3.3 Transitivity 3.4 Preemption. In recent years a great deal of attention has been paid to the context-sensitivity of causal statements. (See Hall 2007; Halpern and Hitchcock, forthcoming; Hitchcock 1996a, 1996b, 2007; Hitchcock and Knobe 2009; Maslen 2004; Menzies 2004a, 2007, 2009; Northcott 2008; Schaffer 2005, 2013) In so far as Lewis's theory overlooks this context-sensitivity, it represents a shortcoming of the theory. The theory assumes that causation is an absolute relation whose nature does not vary from prime effectively, one context to another. (This follows from the way the counterfactuals that define the central notion of the qualitative dissertation, causal dependence are governed by prime effectively, a unique, context-invariant system of 25 page paper, weighted respects of similarity.) According to the theory, any event but for which an a president, effect would not have occurred is cover for fresher software testing one of the effect's causes.

But this generates some absurd results. For example, suppose a camper lights a fire, a sudden gust of wind fans the fire, the fire gets out of control and the forest burns down. It is effectively a president true that if the camper had not lit the fire, the forest fire would not have occurred. But it is also true that the and powerpoint, forest fire would not have occurred if any of a vast number of contingencies, including the camper's birth and his failure to be struck down by is the prime a president essay, a meteor before striking the match, had not occurred. But commonsense draws a distinction between causes and background conditions, ranking the camper's lighting of the fire among the former, and history thesis his birth and his failure to be struck down by prime a president essay, a meteor, among the latter. H. L. A. Hart and A. Writing Understanding! Honoré (1965; 2nd ed 1985) argue that the distinction between causes and conditions is relative to context in at least two different ways. One form of relativity might be called relativity to the context of occurrence.

If a forest is destroyed by fire, the presence of oxygen would be cited as a mere condition of the forest's destruction. On the prime effectively a president, other hand, if a fire breaks out in a laboratory where oxygen is deliberately excluded, it may be appropriate to cite the presence of oxygen as a cause of the fire. Research! The second form of relativity might be called relativity to the context of enquiry. For example, the cause of a great famine in India may be identified by an Indian farmer as the drought, but the World Food Authority may identify the is the minister effectively essay, Indian government's failure to the qualitative dissertation, build up reserves as the is the prime effectively a president essay, cause, and masters the drought as a mere condition. For the is the prime a president, most part, Lewis ignores these subtle context-sensitive distinctions, as he says he is interested in essays, a broad, non-discriminatory notion of cause. Prime! In his view (1986d), every event has an antithesis, objective causal history consisting of a vast structure of events ordered by causal dependence. The human mind may select parts of the causal history for attention, perhaps different parts for different purposes of enquiry. However, Lewis does not specify the ‘principles of is the prime effectively a president essay, invidious selection’ by which some parts of the causal history are selected for attention, except to mention the thesis, relevance of Grice's maxims of is the minister effectively a president essay, conversation. But Grice's maxims of 25 page research, conversation, as general principles of rational information exchange, are not well suited to prime minister, explaining the causation-specific distinctions we draw. As several philosophers have pointed out (A.

Garfinkel (1981); C. Hitchcock (1996a, 1996b); P. Lipton (1990); J. Woodward (1984); and B. Van Fraassen (1981)), some of the hegel history, contextual principles behind our causal judgements seem to rely on considerations concerning which class of is the a president, situations the effect is contrasted with. Thus, in the example of the the qualitative dissertation understanding by doing, Indian famine, we contrast the actual situation in which a famine occurs with another situation in which normal conditions prevail and a famine does not occur. Is The Prime Minister A President Essay! A cause is then thought of dissertation proposal, as a factor that makes the difference between these situations; and prime minister a president the background conditions are thought of as those factors that are common to the two situations. In different contexts of enquiry, the contrast situation is the qualitative dissertation understanding by doing framed in different terms. A farmer may take the contrast situation to be the normal situation in which the government does not stockpile food reserves but there is is the prime minister effectively a president no famine. In this case it would be reasonable for the farmer to identify the drought as the factor that makes the difference between this contrast situation and the actual situation in which there is famine.

On the other hand, an official of the World Food Authority with a different conception of what normally happens may take the 25 page research paper, contrast situation to be one in which governments build up food reserves as a precaution against droughts. Prime Minister A President! Consequently, it would be reasonable for the official to see the failure of the government to build up food reserves as the and powerpoint, factor that makes the difference between the contrast situation and the actual situation in which there is a famine. (For discussion of the relevance of contrastive explanation to the causes/conditions distinction see Menzies 2007 and Schaffer 2005.) A good case can be made that causal statements display contrast-relativity not only at the effect-end but also at the cause-end. (See Hitchcock, 1996a, 1996b; Maslen 2004; Northcott 2008; Schaffer 2005) Recognising this helps to deal with a problem affecting Lewis's original theory. In evaluating whether an event c caused an event e , Lewis's theory says we have to prime minister effectively a president essay, consider what would have happened in understanding, those closest worlds in which c did not occur. For example, in evaluating whether the camper's lighting of the fire caused the forest, we have to consider what would have happened in those closest possible worlds in a president, which the camper's action of lighting the fire did not occur. Are these worlds in which the camper does not light the fire but does something else instead, or are they worlds in which he lights the fire in slightly different manner (perhaps with a lighter instead of matches) or at a slightly different time (three minutes later when the wind died down)?

In order to answer such questions, Lewis says it is necessary to say how much of cover letter testing, a change or a delay it takes for an event to become an effectively essay, altogether different event, rather than a different version of the same event. (Lewis sometimes discusses this issue as the question of how fragile events are: a modally fragile event is one which cannot occur in a different manner or at a different time from its actual manner and time of antithesis synthesis, occurrence. See Lewis 1986b.) The problem, as he sees it, is that there is no unique principled way in which we do this: there is linguistic indeterminancy about what event nominals refer to. He writes: “We have not made up our minds: and if we presuppose sometimes one answer and sometimes another answer, we are entirely within our linguistic rights. This is is the minister effectively a president itself a big problem for a counterfactual analysis of 25 page paper, causation, quite apart from the problem of preemption.” (2000, p.186) However, if we recognise that the cause-end of causal statements displays contrast-relativity as well as the effect-end, we can obviate the need to provide an account of the identity of events under counterfactual changes. For example, suppose we are interested in why the forest fire took one path P 1 rather than another path P 2 . Variation in is the effectively a president essay, the starting point of the fire will be relevant to this difference. So it would be appropriate to say that the camper's lighting the fire in location L 1 rather another location L 2 caused the forest fire to take path P 1 rather than P 2 . On the letter, other hand, suppose that we are interested in why the forest occurred rather did not occur at all. Variation in effectively essay, the starting point of the fire will probably not be relevant to this contrast. Hegel History Thesis Synthesis! Rather the appropriate causal statement will be one that says the camper's lighting the fire (in some or other location) rather his not lighting it (in any location) caused the fire to occur rather than not to occur. Such causal statements reveal the is the prime minister effectively a president, relevant contrasts at both the cause- and the effect-ends. Sometimes, such contrasts are indicated by the use of and powerpoint, emphasis as in “The fire's starting in location L 1 caused the fire to prime minister effectively a president, take path P 1 ”.

But more often than not the surface form of causal statements does not disclose the contrasts that are intended and they must be supplied by context. This fact means that there may be linguistic indeterminacy in thesis and powerpoint, causal statements. But it is not indeterminacy about the reference of event nominals, but rather about the situations that are intended as contrasts for the cause and is the prime minister the effect. Once these are resolved the linguistic indeterminacy is resolved as well. The contrast-relativity of causal statements, if it is genuine, has significant implications for the form that a counterfactual analysis should take. Those who accept the arguments above for the context-relativity of causal statements think that the canonical form of causal statements is “ c rather than c* caused e rather than e* ”, where the contrast situations c* and e* are supplied by context. This suggests that the definition of causal dependence should not be formulated in terms of the counterfactual “If c had not occurred, e would not have occurred”, but the more specific counterfactual “If c* had occurred instead of c , then e* would have occurred instead of e ”. This formulation has several advantages over the old formulation. (For discussion of this point see Schaffer 2005. For criticisms see Steglich-Petersen 2012; Reiss 2013) Its chief advantage from the hegel history thesis antithesis, point of our discussion is that it obviates the need for the counterfactual theory to provide an account of the identity of events under hypothetical changes. With this new formulation, there is no need to is the essay, work out 25 page research, whether c* and e* are identical with, or different from, c and e ,respectively. It is simply stipulated on the basis of contextual considerations that c* and e* are intended to act as contrasts to c and e . There have been several important critical discussions of is the effectively, Lewis's explanation of the temporal asymmetry of causation. (See Elga 2000; Frisch 2007; Hausman 1998: Chap.

6; Horwich 1987: Chap. 10; Loewer 2007; Kutach 2013: Chaps. 3-7; Price 1996: Chap. 6.; Price and Weslake 2009) One kind of criticism has focused on the psychological implausibility of Lewis's explanation. Thesis And Powerpoint! (See Horwich 1987.) Recall that the explanation appeals, on the one hand, to a system of weighted respects of similarity between possible worlds that is delivered by a priori conceptual analysis and, on the other hand, to an asymmetry of is the minister a president essay, overdetermination that is claimed to and powerpoint, be a contingent a posteriori truth about the actual world. The two-part explanation is supposed to employ facts that are sufficiently well known to play a role in the explanation of our linguistic use of prime minister effectively a president essay, counterfactuals. Cover Software! However, it is is the prime effectively essay psychologically implausible that the intricate system of weighted respects of similarity involving comparison of miracles of 25 page, different sizes could capture the intuitive similarity relation used in counterfactual reasoning. Why should we have developed such a baroque notion of similarity?

Moreover, the asymmetry of overdetermination is an esoteric scientific hypothesis that is not common knowledge to everyone using counterfactuals. So it is very unlikely that this hypothesis could account for ordinary speakers' mastery of the temporal asymmetry of counterfactuals. (For Lewis's reply to this criticism see Postscript E to “Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow” in his (1986a, p. 66).) Another criticism is that the asymmetry of overdetermination does not exist in the form required to support Lewis's explanation of the temporal asymmetry of counterfactuals. Lewis's idea is that any event e has many postdeterminants and few predeterminants, where a predeterminant or postdeterminant of an event is a set of is the effectively a president essay, conditions that are jointly sufficient, given the laws of nature, for the occurrence of the event. 25 Page Paper! But if Lewis is assuming that the laws involved are like those of classical mechanics, he is is the prime minister a president essay mistaken on this score. For a theory that is time symmetric and deterministic in both the forward and backward direction will imply that for any local event e and any time t , there is a unique set of conditions obtaining at t that are necessary and sufficient, given the laws, for masters, the occurrence of the event e . The conditions may not be localized conditions that are typically regarded as events, but nonetheless they will qualify as predeterminant or postdeterminants. For example, consider Popper's example of the wave spreading out from a point source. If there is is the minister effectively a process that postdetermines what happens at the point at which the wave is emitted, there is also a process, perhaps a very unlocalized process, that predetermines this. Pace Popper and Lewis, both processes are equally likely; and whether they occur depends on the boundary conditions of the of sexual abuse essays, system. Prime Minister Effectively Essay! (For discussion of this point see Arntzenius 1993; Frisch 2005; North 2003; Price 1996. Also see the entry “Thermodynamic Asymmetry in writing the qualitative dissertation understanding, Time”.)

A related criticism concerns the asymmetry of miracles that is central to Lewis's account of the temporal asymmetry of causation. Is The Minister A President! The asymmetry of miracles consists in cover for fresher testing, the fact that a miracle that realises a counterfactual antecedent about particular facts at time t by having a possible world diverge from the actual world just before the time t is is the minister effectively smaller and less diverse than a miracle that realises the same counterfactual antecedent and makes a possible world converge to the actual world after the time t . Hegel Synthesis! Adam Elga (2000) has argued that the asymmetry of prime a president, miracles does not hold in many cases. Elga's argument proceeds by way of an example: Gretta cracks an egg into a hot frying pan at 8:00am and at 8:05am the egg is antithesis cooked. Consider the is the prime effectively essay, process that occurs in the period from 8:00am to 8:05am, run backwards in 25 page research paper, time: a cooked egg sits in the frypan; it coalesces into a raw egg and leaps upward; and a shell closes around it. The laws of thermodynamics allows that this process is physically possible but extremely rare. These laws also state that the process is is the effectively a president very sensitive in its initial conditions: even the slightest changes in the molecules making up the state of the by doing, cooked egg would result in the process evolving in such a way that the cooked egg continues to sit in the pan rather than coalescing into minister effectively, a raw egg and leaping upwards. But this is, Elga points out, exactly the kind of change that would make for hegel antithesis synthesis, a “convergence miracle”. Take the is the prime effectively essay, state of the writing the qualitative dissertation by doing, actual world at 8:05am, holding fixed its future after this point; make some small changes to the molecules making up this state; and then run the laws of thermodynamics backwards in time, and we will almost certainly arrive at a state in which the egg sits in the pan growing colder.

This state will be one in which Gretta does not crack the egg. The small change in the state of the actual world at 8:05am is a “convergence miracle” that yields a possible world that realises the counterfactual proposition that Gretta does not crack the egg at 8:00am while holding fixed the actual future after 8:05am. But this miracle is not the large, diverse miracle that Lewis claims a convergence miracle would have to be. As we have seen, Lewis builds transitivity into causation by defining it in terms of chains of causal dependence. The transitivity of causation fits with some of our explanatory practices.

For example, historians wishing to explain some significant historical event will trace the explanation back through a number of causal links, concluding that the event at the beginning of the causal chain is responsible for the event being explained. On the other hand, a number of minister effectively a president essay, counter-examples have been presented which cast doubt on transitivity. (Lewis 2004a presents a short catalogue of these counterexamples.) Here is a sample of two counterexamples. First, an of sexual abuse, example due to Ned Hall (2004). A person is walking along a mountain trail, when a boulder high above is dislodged and comes careering down the mountain slopes. The walker notices the is the prime essay, boulder and ducks at the appropriate time. The careering boulder causes the walker to duck and this, in turn, causes his continued stride. (This second causal link involves double prevention : the duck prevents the collision between walker and boulder which, had it occurred, would have prevented the walker's continued stride.) However, the careering boulder is the sort of thing that would prevent the walker's continued stride and so it seems counterintuitive to say that it causes the stride. Second, an example due to Douglas Ehring (1987). Jones puts some potassium salts into a hot fire.

Because potassium compounds produce a purple flame when heated, the flame changes to a purple colour, though everything else remains the same. The purple flame ignites some flammable material nearby. Here we judge that putting the potassium salts in the fire caused the purple flame, which in turn caused the flammable material to ignite. But it seems implausible to judge that putting the potassium salts in the fire caused the flammable material to research, ignite. Various replies have been made to these counterexamples. The second counterexample seems the most easily deflected. Minister A President! For example, Maslen (2004), who endorses the contrast-relativity of causal statements, has argued that this example is misdiagnosed as a counterexample to transitivity, as the contrast situation at the effect-end of the first causal statement does not match up with the contrast situation at the cause-end of the hegel history thesis synthesis, second causal statement. Thus, the first causal statement should be interpreted as saying that Jones's putting potassium salts in the fire rather not doing so caused the flame to turn purple rather than yellow ; but the second causal statement should be interpreted as saying that the purple fire's occurring rather than not occurring caused the flammable material to ignite rather not to ignite. Where there is a mismatch of this kind, we do not have a genuine counterexample to transitivity.

L. Paul (2004) offers a similar diagnosis of the second example, though her diagnosis proceeds in is the a president essay, terms of thesis and powerpoint, event aspects, which she takes to be causation's primary relata. She argues similarly that there is mismatch between the event aspect that is the effect of the first causal link (the flame's being a purple colour) and the event aspect that is the is the prime minister a president, cause of the second causal link (the flame's touching the flammable material). The first example cannot be handled in the same way. And Powerpoint! Some defenders of transitivity have replied that our intuitions about the minister, intransitivity of causation in these examples are misleading. For instance, Lewis (2004a) points out that the counterexamples to writing understanding by doing, transitivity typically involve a structure in which a c -type event generally prevents an e -type but in prime minister effectively, the particular case the c -event actually causes another event that counters the threat and causes the 25 page paper, e -event. If we mix up questions of what is is the generally conducive to what, with questions about what caused what in 25 page paper, this particular case, he says, we may think that it is reasonable to deny that c causes e . Is The Prime A President! But if we keep the focus sharply on the particular case, we must insist that c does in fact cause e . The debate about the transitivity of causation is not easily settled, partly because it is tied up with the issue of how it is best for a counterfactual theory to deal with examples of preemption. As we have seen, Lewis's counterfactual theory relies on masters dissertation, the transitivity of causation to handle cases of preemption. If such cases could be handled in prime a president essay, some other way, that would take some of the theoretical pressure off the theory, allowing it concede the persuasive counterexamples to transitivity without succumbing to the difficulties posed by preemption. (For more on this point see Hitchcock 2001.

For an extensive discussion of the issues around transitivity see Paul and Hall: Chap. 5.) As we have seen, Lewis employs his strategy of defining causation in terms of chains of the qualitative, causal dependence not only to make causation transitive, but also to deal with preemption examples. However, there are preemption examples that this strategy cannot deal with satisfactorily. Difficulties concerning preemption have proven to be the biggest bugbear for Lewis's theory.(Paul and Hall 2013: Chap 3 contains an extensive discussion of the problems posed by preemption and prime minister essay other kinds of redundant causation for counterfactual theories.) In his (1986c), Lewis distinguishes cases of early and late preemption . In early preemption examples, the process running from the preempted alternative is cut short before the main process running from the cover letter for fresher testing, preempting cause has gone to completion. The example of the is the minister a president essay, two assassins, given above, is an example of this sort. The theory of causation in terms of masters proposal, chains of causal dependence can handle this sort of example.

In contrast, cases of is the effectively a president, late preemption are ones in which the process running from the preempted cause is cut short only after the main process has gone to completion and brought about the effect. The following is an effects essays, example of late preemption due to Hall (2004). Billy and Suzy throw rocks at a bottle. Suzy throws first so that her rock arrives first and shatters the glass. Without Suzy's throw, Billy's throw would have shattered the bottle. Is The! However, Suzy's throw is the actual cause of the shattered bottle, while Billy's throw is merely a preempted potential cause. This is a case of research paper, late preemption because the alternative process (Billy's throw) is cut short after the main process (Suzy's throw) has actually brought about the effect. Lewis's theory cannot explain the judgement that Suzy's throw was the actual cause of the shattering of the bottle. Prime Minister Effectively Essay! For there is no causal dependence between Suzy's throw and the shattering, since even if Suzy had not thrown her rock, the bottle would have shattered due to Billy's throw. Nor is there a chain of stepwise dependences running cause to effect, because there is no event intermediate between Suzy's throw and the shattering that links them up into a chain of dependences.

Take, for instance, Suzy's rock in mid-trajectory. Certainly, this event depends on Suzy's initial throw, but the problem is of sexual abuse essays that the shattering of the bottle does not depend on it, because even without it the bottle would still have shattered because of Billy's throw. To be sure, the bottle shattering that would have occurred without Suzy's throw would be different from the bottle shattering that actually occurred with Suzy's throw. For a start, it would have occurred later. This observation suggests that one solution to is the a president essay, the problem of effects of sexual, late preemption might be to insist that the is the minister effectively a president essay, events involved should be construed as fragile events. Thesis Synthesis! Accordingly, it will be true rather than false that if Suzy had not thrown her rock, then the actual bottle shattering, taken as a fragile event with an essential time and manner of occurrence, would not have occurred. Lewis himself does not endorse this response on the grounds that a uniform policy of construing events as fragile would go against our usual practices, and would generate many spurious causal dependences. Is The Effectively A President! For example, suppose that a poison kills its victim more slowly and painfully when taken on a full stomach. Then, the victim's eating dinner before he drinks the poison would count as a cause of his death since the time and manner of the death depend on the eating of the dinner. (For discussion of the limitations of this response see Lewis 1986c, 2000.) When we turn from preemption examples involving deterministic causation to those involving chancy causation, we see that the problems for Lewis's theory multiply.

One particularly recalcitrant problem is described in Menzies 1989. (See also Woodward 1990.) Suppose that two systems can produce the same effect, perhaps at the same time and in the same manner. Hegel History Thesis Antithesis! (It does not matter whether this is an example of early or late preemption.) However, one system is is the effectively much more reliable than the other. The reliable system starts and, left to itself, will very probably produce the effect. But you do not leave it to writing understanding by doing, itself. You throw a switch that shuts down the reliable system and turns on the unreliable one. As luck would have it, the unreliable system works and brings about the effect. This kind of example presents a problem for the probabilistic generalisation of the counterfactual theory because the preempting actual cause decreases the chance of the effect while the preempted potential cause increases its chance. In addition to the problem of explaining how the preempting cause qualifies as a cause when the effect does not causally depend on it, the probabilistic counterfactual theory faces the problem of explaining how the preempted cause is not really a cause when the effect does causally depend on it.(Examples of this kind have been the subject of extensive discussion in the context of is the prime effectively essay, both counterfactual and probabilistic theories of causation. Of Sexual Abuse Essays! For discussions about how best to is the prime a president essay, deal with them within theories admitting of indeterminism, see Barker 2004; Beebee 2004; Dowe 2000, 2004; Hitchcock 2004; Kvart 2004; Noordhof 1999, 2004; Ramachandran 1997, 2004.) In this section we shall consider some recent developments of the counterfactual approach to hegel thesis antithesis synthesis, causation, which have been motivated by the desire to overcome the deficiencies in Lewis's 1973 theory, especially with respect to preemption. 4.1 Lewis's 2000 Theory 4.2 Causation as Intrinsic Relation 4.3 The Structural Equations Framework.

In an attempt to deal with the various problems facing his 1973 theory, Lewis developed a new version of the counterfactual theory, which he first presented in his Whitehead Lectures at Harvard University in March 1999. (A shortened version of the lectures appeared as his (2000). The full lectures are published as his (2004a).) Counterfactuals play a central role in the new theory, as in the old. But the counterfactuals it employs do not simply state dependences of whether one event occurs on whether another event occurs. The counterfactuals state dependences of whether , when , and how one event occurs on whether , when , and how another event occurs. A key idea in prime effectively, the formulation of these counterfactuals is that of an alteration of an event. The Qualitative Dissertation Understanding! This is an actualised or unactualised event that occurs at a slightly different time or in a slightly different manner from the given event. An alteration is, by definition, a very fragile event that could not occur at a different time, or in a different manner without being a different event. Lewis intends the terminology to be neutral on is the minister effectively a president essay, the issue of whether an alteration of an dissertation, event is is the prime effectively essay a version of the same event or a numerically different event.

The central notion of the new theory is that of influence. Where one event influences another, there is proposal a pattern of counterfactual dependence of whether, when, and how upon whether, when, and how. As before, causation is defined as an ancestral relation. One of the points Lewis advances in favour of this new theory is that it handles cases of late as well as early pre-emption. (The theory is restricted to deterministic causation and so does not address the example of probabilistic preemption described in section 3.4.) Reconsider, for instance, the prime effectively a president, example of late preemption involving Billy and Suzy throwing rocks at abuse on children essays, a bottle. The theory is supposed to explain why Suzy's throw, and minister a president not Billy's throw, is the for fresher software, cause of the shattering of the bottle. If we take an minister a president, alteration in which Suzy's throw is hegel thesis slightly different (the rock is lighter, or she throws sooner), while holding fixed Billy's throw, we find that the shattering is different too. But if we make similar alterations to Billy's throw while holding Suzy's throw fixed, we find that the shattering is is the a president unchanged. Another point in favour of the new theory is that it handles a type of preemption Lewis that have come to be called trumping . (Trumping was first described by Jonathan Schaffer(2000).) Lewis gives an history, example involving a major and a sergeant who are shouting orders at the soldiers. The major and sergeant simultaneously shout “Advance”; the soldiers hear them both and advance. Since the prime minister effectively essay, soldiers obey the superior officer, they advance because the major orders them to, not because the sergeant does.

So the major's command preempts or trumps the sergeant's. Where other theories have difficulty with trumping cases, Lewis's argues his new theory handles them with ease. Altering the major's command while holding fixed the sergeant's, the letter for fresher software testing, soldier's response would be correspondingly altered. In contrast, altering the minister a president essay, sergeant's command, while holding fixed the major's, would make no difference at all. There is, however, some reason for scepticism about whether the new theory handles the examples of late preemption and trumping completely satisfactorily.

In the example of late preemption, Billy's throw has some degree of influence on the shattering of the bottle. For if Billy had thrown his rock earlier (so that it preceded Suzy's throw) and in a different manner, the bottle would have shattered earlier and in a different manner. Likewise, the sergeant's command has some degree of influence on the soldiers' advance in that if the history thesis, sergeant had shouted earlier than the major with a different command, the soldiers would have obeyed his order. In response to these points, Lewis must say that these alterations of the events are too-distant to be considered relevant. But some metric of distance in alterations is required, since it seems that similar alterations of Suzy's throw and is the minister a president essay the major's command are relevant to their having causal influence. It has also been argued that the of sexual essays, new theory generates a great number of spurious instances of causation. A President Essay! (For discussion see Collins 2000; Kvart 2001.) The theory implies that any event that influences another event to a certain degree counts as one of its causes. But common sense is more discriminating about causes. To take an example of Jonathan Bennett (1987): rain in December delays a forest fire; if there had been no December rain, the forest would have caught fire in January rather than when it actually did in February. The rain influences the fire with respect to effects abuse essays, its timing, location, rapidity, and so forth.

But common sense denies that the rain was a cause of the fire , though it allows that it is a cause of the delay in minister a president, the fire . Similarly, in effects essays, the example of the poison victim discussed above, the victim's ingesting poison on a full stomach influences the time and manner of his death (making it a slow and is the prime minister essay painful death), but common sense refuses to countenance his eating dinner as a cause of his death , though it may countenance it as a cause of its being a slow and painful death . Pace Lewis, common sense does not take anything that affects the time and manner of an history antithesis synthesis, event to is the a president essay, be a cause of the masters, event simpliciter . 4.2 Causation as Intrinsic Relation. One way of treating preemption that has been recently discussed departs from a purely counterfactual analysis of causation. It has been argued that preemption examples highlight the intuitive idea that causation is an intrinsic relation between events, which is to say it is a local relation depending on the intrinsic properties of the events and what goes on between them, and is the prime minister a president nothing else. The proposed treatments of preemption marry this intuitive idea with a crucial deployment of counterfactuals. At one time Lewis himself resorted to this way of thesis, treating late preemption examples when he invoked the notion of prime minister effectively a president essay, quasi-dependence . Proposal! (See his (1986c).) To explain this notion consider a case that resembles the is the, case of for fresher testing, Billy and prime minister Suzy throwing rocks at a bottle.

Suzy throws a rock and cover for fresher software testing shatters the bottle in exactly the same way in which she does in the original case. Prime Effectively Essay! But in hegel antithesis synthesis, this case Billy and his rock are entirely absent. Lewis argued that since the process in the original case and the process in the comparison case are intrinsically alike (and also obey the same laws), both or neither must be causal. However, the comparison process is surely a causal process since, thanks to Billy's absence, it exhibits a causal dependence. Minister Effectively Essay! Accordingly, the effects, process in the original case must be a causal process too, even though it does not exhibit a causal dependence. In such examples Lewis has said that the actual process that does not exhibit causal dependence is, nonetheless, causal by courtesy: it exhibits quasi-dependence in virtue of its intrinsic resemblance to prime minister effectively a president essay, the causal process in and powerpoint, the comparison case.

A related idea is is the prime minister effectively a president pursued in Menzies (1996; 1999). Menzies argues that there is an the qualitative dissertation, element in our concept of causation that resists capture in purely counterfactual terms. This element consists in the idea that causation is a structural relation that underlies and supports causal dependences. This idea can be captured by treating the concept of causation as the concept of a theoretical entity. Applying a standard treatment of theoretical concepts, he argues that causation should be defined as the unique occupant of a certain characteristic role given by the platitudes of the folk theory of causation. One platitude is that causation is an intrinsic relation between events. Another platitude is that it is typically , but not invariably, accompanied by causal dependence.

Accordingly, causation is prime minister effectively essay defined in the following way: On this account, causation is not constituted by causal dependence. Effects Of Sexual! It is, in fact, a distinct relation for which causal dependence is, at prime, best, a defeasible marker. The relation may be identified a posteriori with some physically specifiable relation such as energy-momentum transfer. It may, indeed, be identified with different relations in different possible worlds. This definition is supposed to explain common sense intuitions about preemption examples.

For example, Suzy's throw, and effects not Billy's throw, caused the shattering of the bottle, because the intrinsic relation that typically accompanies causal dependence connects Suzy's throw, but not Billy's throw, with the shattering of the bottle. Lewis later rejected the approach to preemption via quasi-dependence in favour of his 2000 theory in terms of influence. In Lewis 2004a and 2004b, he claims that theories of causation as an is the prime minister a president, intrinsic relation do not do justice to the full range of writing understanding, our intuitions about causation. (For related points see Hall 2002, 2004.) He offers several reasons, but one reason will suffice for our discussion. The intuition that causation is an intrinsic matter does not apply to cases of double prevention. Suppose that billiard balls 1 and 2 collide, preventing ball 1 from continuing on its way and hitting ball 3. If the collision of balls 1 and prime minister effectively a president essay 3 had occurred, ball 3 would not have later collided with ball 4. So, we have double prevention: the dissertation understanding, collision of balls 1 and 2 prevented the collision of balls 1 and 3, which would have prevented the later collision of balls 3 and 4. Here it seems reasonable to say that the collision of is the prime effectively essay, balls 1 and 2 was a cause of the later collision of balls 3 and 4. And Powerpoint! Lewis observes that the is the a president essay, causation in such cases of double prevention is partly an extrinsic matter. If there had been some other obstruction that would have stopped ball 1 from hitting ball 3, the letter software testing, collision of prime minister essay, 3 and 4 would not have depended on the collision of 1 and 2. Moreover, he notes that much of the spatiotemporal region between the collision of balls 1 and 2 and the collision of balls 3 and 4 is simply empty so that there is no chain of events to serve as a connecting process between cause and effect. The intuition that causation is an intrinsic relation does not apply in this case. Masters Dissertation! More generally, he argues that theories of causation as an intrinsic relation are overhasty generalisations of one specific kind of causation, and they fail to do justice to our intuitions about causation involving absences (as causes, effects or intermediaries). 4.3 The Structural Equations Framework.

A number of contemporary philosophers (Hitchcock 2001, 2007; Woodward 2003; Woodward and Hitchcock 2003) have explored an alternative counterfactual approach to is the minister a president essay, causation that employs the structural equations framework. This framework, which has been used in writing the qualitative understanding by doing, the social sciences and biomedical sciences since the is the effectively essay, 1930s and 1940s, received its state-of-the-art formulation in Judea Pearl's landmark 2000 book. Hitchcock and Woodward acknowledge their debt to masters proposal, Pearl's work and to the related work on causal Bayes nets by Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour, and Richard Scheines (1993). Is The Minister Effectively A President Essay! However, while Pearl and Spirtes, Glymour and dissertation proposal Scheines focus on issues to do with causal discovery and inference, Woodward and Hitchcock focus on issues of the meaning of causal claims. For this reason, their formulations of the structural equations framework are better suited to the purposes of prime minister a president, this discussion.

The exposition of software testing, this section follows that of Hitchcock 2001, in particular. While philosophical work using this framework has only just begun, it would seem that this framework looks likely to rival Lewis's framework in terms of its theoretical richness and is the a president fruitfulness. The structural equations framework describes the causal structure of a system in terms of a causal model of the system, which is 25 page research identified as an ordered pair V , E , where V is prime minister a president a set of variables and E a set of structural equations stating deterministic relations among the variables. (We shall confine our attention in masters, this section to deterministic systems.) The variables in V describe the different possible states of the system in question. While they can take any number of is the prime minister effectively a president, values, in the simple examples to be considered here the variables are typically binary variables that take the value 1 if some event occurs and the value 0 if the event does not occur. For example, let us formulate a causal model to describe the system exemplified in the example of late preemption to do with Billy and Suzy's rock throwing. We might describe the system using the following set of variables: BT = 1 if Billy throws a rock, 0 otherwise; ST = 1 if Suzy throws a rock, 0 otherwise; BH = 1 if Billy's rock hits the bottle, 0 otherwise; SH = 1 if Suzy's rock hits the bottle, 0 otherwise; BS = 1 if the bottle shatters, 0 otherwise. Here the variables are binary. But a different model might have used many-valued variables to represent the different ways in which Billy and Suzy threw their rocks, their rocks hit the bottle, or the bottle shattered.

The structural equations in a model describe the dynamical evolution of the system being modelled. There is a structural equation for each variable. The form taken by a structural equation for a variable depends on which kind of masters, variable it is. The structural equation for an exogenous variable (the values of which are determined by factors outside of the model) takes the form of prime effectively a president, Y = y , which simply states the letter software, actual value of the variable. Is The Minister Effectively A President! The structural equation for an endogenous variable (the values of which are determined by factors within the model) states how the value of the variable is determined by the values of the other variables.

It takes the form: What does this structural equation mean? There are in fact competing interpretations. Pearl (2000) regards the structural equations as the conceptual primitives of his framework, describing them as representing the thesis and powerpoint, basic mechanisms of the is the, system under investigation. However, for the purposes of exposition, it is more convenient to follow the interpretation of Woodward (2003) and writing the qualitative dissertation Hitchcock (2001), who think of the structural equations as expressing certain basic counterfactuals of the following form:

As this form of counterfactual suggests, the structural equations are to be read from right to left: the antecedent of the counterfactual states possible values of the variables X 1 through to X n and the consequent states the corresponding value of the endogenous variable Y . There is a counterfactual of prime effectively a president essay, this kind for every combination of possible values of the variables X 1 through to X n . It is important to note that a structural equation of this kind is not, strictly speaking, an identity since there is a right-to-left asymmetry built into it. This asymmetry corresponds to the asymmetry of non-backtracking counterfactuals. Effects! For example, supposing that the actual situation is one in which neither Suzy nor Billy throws a rock so the bottle does not shatter, the non-backtracking counterfactual “If either Suzy or Billy had thrown a rock, the bottle would have shattered” is true. But the counterfactual “If the bottle had shattered, either Suzy or Billy would have thrown a rock” is false. As an illustration, consider the set of structural equations that might be used to model the late preemption example of Billy and Suzy. Given the variables listed above, the prime effectively, structural equations might be stated as follows: In these equations logical symbols are used to represent mathematical functions on binary variables: X = 1 − X ; X v Y = max X , Y ; X Y = min X , Y . The first two equations simply state the actual values of the exogenous variables ST and BT . The third equation encodes two counterfactuals, one for each possible value of ST . It states that if Suzy threw a rock, her rock hit the bottle; and if she didn't throw a rock, her rock didn't hit the bottle. Dissertation! The fourth equation encodes four counterfactuals, one for is the prime minister effectively a president, each possible combination of values for BT and. SH . It states that if Billy threw a rock and Suzy's rock didn't hit the bottle, Billy's rock hit the bottle; but didn't do so if one or more of these conditions was not met.

The fifth equation encodes four counterfactuals, one for each possible combination of values for SH and BH . It states that if one or other (or possibly both) of Suzy's rock or Billy's rock hit the dissertation proposal, bottle, the effectively a president, bottle shattered; but if neither rock hit the bottle, the bottle didn't shatter. The structural equations above can be represented in terms of history thesis, a directed graph . The variables in the set V are represented as nodes in the graph. An arrow directed from one node X to another Y represents the fact that the variable X appears on the right-hand side of the structural equation for a president essay, Y . In this case, X is said to be a parent of Y . On Children Essays! Exogenous variables are represented by nodes that have no arrows directed towards them. A directed path from X to Y in a graph is a sequence of arrows that connect X with Y . The directed graph of the model described above of Billy and Suzy example is depicted in Figure 1 below: The arrows in this figure tell us that the bottle's shattering is a function of Suzy's rock hitting the bottle and Billy's rock hitting the bottle; that Billy's rock hitting the bottle is a function of Billy's throwing a rock and Suzy's rock hitting the is the prime, bottle; and that Suzy's rock hitting the bottle is dissertation proposal a function of her throwing the rock. As we have seen, the structural equations directly encode some counterfactuals. However, some counterfactuals that are not directly encoded can be derived from them. Consider, for example, the counterfactual “If Suzy's rock had not hit the bottle, it would still have shattered”.

As a matter of fact, Suzy's rock did hit the bottle. But we can determine what would have happened if it hadn't done so, by replacing the is the effectively, structural equation for the endogenous variable SH with the masters dissertation, equation SH = 0, keeping all the other equations unchanged. So, instead of is the, having its value determined in the ordinary way by the variable ST , the value of SH is set “miraculously”. Pearl describes this as a “surgical intervention” that changes the value of the variable. In terms of its graphical representation,this amounts to wiping out the arrow from the abuse on children, variable ST to the variable SH and effectively a president essay treating SH as if it were an exogenous variable. After this operation, the value of the variable BS can be computed and shown to be equal to 1: given that Billy had thrown his rock, his rock would have hit the writing the qualitative dissertation, bottle and shattered it. So this particular counterfactual is true. This procedure for evaluating counterfactuals has direct affinities with Lewis's non-backtracking interpretation of counterfactuals: the surgical intervention that sets the variable SH at is the minister, its hypothetical value but keeps all other equations unchanged is history similar in its effects to Lewis's small miracle that realises the counterfactual antecedent but preserves the past. In general, to is the prime a president essay, evaluate a counterfactual, say “If it were the case that X 1 ,,X n , then ”, one replaces the original equation for each variable X i with a new equation stipulating its hypothetical value,while keeping the other equations unchanged; then one computes the values for the remaining variables to see whether they make the consequent true. This technique of replacing an equation with a hypothetical value set by a “surgical intervention” enables us to capture the notion of counterfactual dependence between variables:

How does the structural equations framework deal with examples of late pre-emption that pose such problems for Lewis's counterfactual theory? Can this framework deliver the intuitively correct verdicts in the example about Suzy and Billy? Halpern and Pearl (2001,2005), Hitchcock (2001),and Woodward (2003a) all give roughly the same treatment of examples of late preemption. The key to their treatment is the employment of a certain procedure for testing the existence of a causal relation. Masters Proposal! The procedure is to look for an intrinsic process connecting the putative cause and effect; suppress the influence of their non-intrinsic surroundings by “freezing” those surroundings as they actually are; and then subject the prime minister a president, putative cause to a counterfactual test. So, for hegel history thesis synthesis, example, to test whether the variable Suzy's throwing a rock caused the prime effectively essay, bottle to shatter, we should examine the process running from ST through SH to BS ; hold fix at its actual value the variable BH which is extrinsic to this process; and then wiggle the variable ST to see if it changes the value of BS . The last steps involve evaluating the counterfactual “If Suzy hadn't thrown a rock and Billy's rock hadn't hit the bottle, the bottle would not have shattered”. It is easy to see that this counterfactual is true. In contrast, when we carry out a similar procedure to test whether Billy's throwing a rock caused the bottle to shatter,we are required to consider the counterfactual “If Billy hadn't thrown his rock and Suzy's rock had hit the bottle, the bottle would not shattered”. This counterfactual is false. It is the difference in the truth-value of these two counterfactuals that explains the fact that it was Suzy's rock throwing, and not Billy's, that caused the bottle to shatter. Masters! (A similar theory is developed in Yablo 2002 and 2004 though not in prime a president, the structural equations framework.) Hitchcock (2001) presents a useful regimentation of this reasoning.

He defines a route between two variables X and Z in the set V to be an ordered sequence of variables X , Y 1 ,, Y n , Z such each variable in 25 page research, the sequence is in essay, V and is a parent of its successor in the sequence. A variable Y is intermediate between X and Z if and only if it belongs to some route between X and Z . Then he introduces the new concept of an active causal route: This definition generalises the informal idea sketched in the example of dissertation proposal, Suzy and Billy. There is an active causal route going from Suzy's throwing her rock through her rock hitting the bottle to the bottle shattering: when we hold fixed Billy's rock not hitting the bottle, which is the actual value of the only intermediate variable BH that is not on this route, we see that the bottle's shattering counterfactually depends on is the, Suzy's throwing her rock. There is, however, no active causal route between Billy's throwing his rock and the bottle shattering. In terms of the notion of an active causal route, Hitchcock defines actual or token causation in effects of sexual, the following terms: A crucial notion in this definition is that of “an appropriate” model. It would be undesirable to is the a president, have multiple structures of causal relations being posited by different models willy-nilly. So Hitchcock insists causal relations are revealed only by “appropriate models”.

He mentions a number of 25 page, criteria for appraising whether a model is prime minister essay appropriate, the effects of sexual abuse on children essays, most important one being that the structural equations posited by the model must not imply any false counterfactual. In order to deal with examples of symmetric overdetermination, Hitchcock (2001) defines a notion of prime minister effectively essay, a weakly active route , the essential idea being that there is a weakly active route between X and Y just when Y counterfactually depends on masters proposal, X under the freezing of minister effectively, some possible, not necessarily actual, values of the variables that are not on the route from X to Y . As we shall not be considering any examples of masters proposal, oversymmetric overdetermination, we shall focus on the stronger notion of an active causal route. This account of causation differs from Lewis's accounts in a number of respects. Is The! One difference is that the account does not appeal to letter software testing, the transitivity of causation to deal with preemption examples, in contrast to Lewis's accounts, both early and late. Prime Minister! Hitchcock (2001) is at pains to stress that the structural equations framework described above allows for failures of transitivity. Another difference between the accounts is that the structural equations account appeals to special counterfactuals with complex antecedents in order to paper, handle preemption examples. Is The Prime A President! These counterfactuals describe what would happen if a causal variable were changed when certain other variables are held fixed at for fresher software testing, their actual values. (Hitchcock calls these “explicitly nonforetracking counterfactuals”.) Lewis's accounts does not make use of such counterfactuals, relying as it does on counterfactuals with simple antecedents that describe single changes in the causal variables. The differences between the accounts should not, however, overshadow the similarities that also exist. Both accounts make central use of non-backtracking counterfactuals and they interpret these counterfactuals in roughly the same fashion. Setting aside complications to do with backwards causation, Lewis's account and the structural equations account have us evaluate a non-backtracking counterfactual in much the same way: we are to hold fixed the past history of the system, imagine that the prime effectively a president, antecedent is realised “miraculously” by a surgical intervention from hegel history thesis synthesis, outside the system, and then consider how the new state of the system would evolve in conformity with the structural equations or laws of the system without any further interventions. How plausible is this new counterfactual approach to is the prime effectively essay, causation?

It is too early to say with any confidence, as the approach is still being developed. Nonetheless, some early problems have emerged. (See Hall 2007; Halpern and Pearl 2005; Halpern and Hitchcock forthcoming; Hitchcock 2007; Menzies 2004b; Weslake forthcoming.) Consider, for instance, the following example, which is a variant of one described by hegel history, Hitchcock (2007). An assassin puts poison in the king's coffee. The bodyguard responds by is the prime essay, pouring an antidote in the king's coffee. If the dissertation, bodyguard had not poured the antidote in is the prime a president essay, the coffee, the king would have died. On the other hand, the antidote is fatal when taken by itself; and writing if the is the prime minister a president essay, poison had not been poured in first, it would have killed the king. The poison and the antidote are both lethal when taken singly but neutralise each other when taken together. In fact, the king drinks the coffee and survives. Suppose we model this scenario using the following variables: A = 1 if the of sexual abuse on children, assassin pours poison into the king's coffee, 0 otherwise; G = 1 if the bodyguard responds by pouring antidote into the coffee, 0 otherwise; S = 1 if the king survives, 0 otherwise. And also suppose that we employ these structural equations:

The directed graph for this model is is the prime a president essay depicted in Figure 2. Testing for active causal processes, we can see that the process that goes directly from the assassin's pouring the poison in the coffee to the king's survival is active. Holding fixed the fact that the bodyguard poured the lethal antidote into the coffee, we note that the king would not have survived if the assassin had not put the poison in the coffee first. So the theory licenses the verdict that the synthesis, assassin's pouring in minister effectively a president essay, the poison caused the king to masters dissertation, survive. However, many regard this as a mistaken causal verdict: putting poison in the king's coffee is exactly the kind of thing that is likely to kill the is the prime minister essay, king. It might be argued that the causal verdict is justified in effects of sexual abuse, view of the fact that the assassin's action caused the bodyguard's action, which in turn caused the king's survival. But this appeal to the transitivity of causation is not open to the defenders of this theory, who deny the validity of transitivity.

One counterexample by itself is not enough to disprove the whole structural equations framework. Strictly speaking, it only casts doubt on the theory of is the prime effectively essay, causation that defines causation in terms of the presence of an active causal route. Cover For Fresher! There are alternative definitions within the structural equations framework that might fare better. (See Halpern and Pearl 2005; Weslake forthcoming.) One possibility explored by several philosophers is to appeal to is the, a distinction between what Hitchcock has called “default” and “deviant” values of variables.(See Hitchcock 2007.) The default value of some variable represents a normal or to-be-expected state of the letter, system, whereas a deviant value represents an abnormal or unusual state of the system. The correlative notion of the default course of evolution for a system can be characterised as a temporally-ordered sequence of values that the is the prime a president, variables in a model take when the default values of the exogenous variables are plugged into the structural equations of the model. Thus, if we set the value of the exogenous variable A in the example above at its default value 0 instead of its actual value 1, we can see that the scenario described above will evolve in the qualitative dissertation, the following way: the assassin doesn't put the poison in the coffee, the bodyguard doesn't put the antidote into the coffee, and the king survives. Now if we evaluate counterfactual dependences with counterfactuals centred on the default course of evolution rather than the actual course of evolution, we can see that the bodyguard's action counterfactually depends on is the prime minister a president, the assassin's action and the king's survival depends on software, the bodyguard's action, but the prime, king's survival doesn't depend on the assassin's action. If counterfactual dependences centred on the default course of evolution are taken to indicate causal relations, these counterfactual dependences more accurately reflect our intuitive causal judgements. (For further discussion of this idea, see Hall 2007 and dissertation Menzies 2004b, 2007.) It remains to be seen whether the various attempts to augment the structural equations framework with a distinction between default and deviant values are successful or not. (For other attempts see Hitchcock 2007; and Halpern and prime effectively a president Hitchcock forthcoming; Hitchcock and Knobe 2009. Of Sexual Essays! For a critical discussion of these attempts see Schaffer 2013. Is The Effectively! For general discussion of the role of the default/deviant distinction in causal judgements see Maudlin 2004.)

Arntzenius, F., 1993. “The Classical Failure to Account for Electromagnetic Arrows of Time”, in G. Massey, T. Horowitz and A. Janis (eds.), Scientific Failure , Lanham: Rowman and Littlfield, pp. 2948. Barker, S., 2004. “Analysing Chancy Causation without Appeal to Chance-raising”, in P. Dowe and P. Noordhof (eds.) 2004, pp. 120137. 25 Page Paper! Beebee, H., 2004. “Chance-changing Causal Processes”, in P. Dowe and P. Noordhof (eds.) 2004, pp.

3957. Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. and Menzies, P., 2009. The Oxford Handbook of is the prime minister effectively a president, Causation , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bennett, J., 1987. “Event Causation: the Counterfactual Analysis”, Philosophical Perspectives , 1: 36786. Blaauw, M., 2013. Contrastivism in Philosophy , London: Routledge. Collins, J., 2000. “Preemptive Preemption”, Journal of Philosophy , 97: 22334. Collins, J., Hall, E., and Paul, L., 2004. Causation and effects of sexual essays Counterfactuals , Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Dowe, P., 2000. Physical Causation , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. , 2004. “Chance-lowering Causes”, in Dowe and Noordhof (2004), pp.2838.

Dowe, P and P. A President Essay! Noordhof, 2004. Cause and Chance: Causation in an Indeterministic World , London: Routledge. History Thesis Antithesis Synthesis! Elga, A., 2000. “Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence”, Philosophy of Science , 68 (Supplement): 313324. A President! Ehring, D., 1987. “Causal Relata”, Synthese , 73: 319328. Fine, K., 1975. “Review of Lewis (1973a)”, Mind , 84: 4518. Frisch, M., 2005.

Inconsistency, Asymmetry and Non-Locality: Philosophical Issues in effects abuse essays, Classical Electrodynamics , New York: Oxford University Press. , 2007. “Causation, Counterfactuals and is the prime a president essay Entropy”, in Price and effects of sexual essays Corry (2007). Is The Prime Minister Effectively! Garfinkel, A., 1981. Forms of Explanation , New Haven: Yale University Press. Goodman, N., 1947. “The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals”, Journal of Philosophy , 44: 113128. Reprinted in Goodman (1983). , 1983. History Synthesis! Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Hall, N., 2000. “Causation and the Price of Transitivity”, Journal of is the effectively, Philosophy , 97: 198222. , 2002. “Non-locality on the Cheap?”, Noûs ,36, pp.276294. , 2004. Effects Of Sexual Abuse Essays! “Two Concepts of Causation”, in Collins, Hall, and prime effectively a president essay Paul (2004), pp. 22576. And Powerpoint! , 2007. “Structural Equations and Causation”, Philosophical Studies , 132(1): 109136. Halpern, J. and is the prime minister essay Pearl, J., 2001. “Causes and Explanations: A Structural-model Approach Part I: Causes”, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on paper, Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence , San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, pp. 194202. Is The Prime Minister Effectively A President! , 2005. “Causes and Rxplanations: A Structural-model Approach Part I: Causes”,(expanded version), British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 56: 843887.

Halpern, J. and Hitchcock, C., forthcoming. “Graded Causation and Defaults”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science . Hart, H. L. and Honore, A., 1965. Causation in the Law , Oxford: Clarendon Press. Second edition 1985. Paper! Hausman, D., 1998. Causal Asymmetries , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hitchcock, C. and Knobe, J., 2009. Prime A President! “Cause and Norm”, Journal of thesis, Philosophy , 106: 587612. Hitchcock, C., 1996a. Is The Effectively A President Essay! “The Role of Contrast in Causal and Explanatory Claims”, Synthese , 107: 395419. , 1996b. “Farewell to Binary Causation”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy , 26: 335364. , 2001. “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs”, Journal of Philosophy , 98: 27399. , 2004. “Do All and research paper Only Causes Raise the Probabilities of Effects?”, in Collins, Hall and Paul (2004), pp. Effectively A President Essay! 403418. , 2007. “Prevention, Preemption, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason”, Philosophical Review , 116(4): 495532. Horwich, P., 1987.

Asymmetries in Time , Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Hume, D., 1748. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding . Kim, J., 1973. “Causes and the qualitative Counterfactuals”, Journal of Philosophy , 70: 57072. Prime Effectively A President! Kutach, D., 2013. Causation and its Basis in Fundamental Physics , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kvart, I., 2001. Letter Software! “Counterexamples to Lewis' ‘Causation as Influence’”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy , 79: 41123. Prime Effectively! , 2004. “Causation:Probabilistic and effects of sexual essays Counterfactual Analyses”, in Collins, Hall, and Paul (2004), pp. Is The Prime Minister Effectively Essay! 359386.

Lewis, D., 1973a. Counterfactuals , Oxford: Blackwell. , 1973b. “Causation”, Journal of essays, Philosophy , 70: 55667. Reprinted in is the minister effectively, his (1986a). Page references to reprinted version. , 1979. “Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow”, Noûs , 13: 45576. Reprinted in his (1986a). Effects Essays! , 1980. “A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance”, in R. Jeffrey, ed., Studies in minister a president essay, Inductive Logic and Probability: Volume II , Reprinted in his (1986a). , 1986a. Philosophical Papers: Volume II , Oxford: Oxford University Press. , 1986b. “Events”, in cover testing, his (1986a). Is The A President! , 1986c. “Postscripts to ‘Causation’”, in his (1986a). , 1986d. “Causal Explanation”, in his (1986a). , 1986e. The Plurality of Worlds , Oxford: Blackwell. , 2000. “Causation as Influence”, Journal of Philosophy , 97: 18297; reprinted in his (2004a) (page references to reprinted version). Writing Dissertation! , 2004a. Prime Minister Effectively Essay! “Causation as Influence”, in Collins, Hall, and Paul (2004), pp.

75106. , 2004b. Abuse On Children! “Void and prime minister a president essay Object”, in Collins, Hall, and 25 page research paper Paul 2004, pp. 27790. Lipton, P., 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation , London: Routledge. Loewer, B., 2007. “Counterfactuals and the Second Law” in Price and Corry 2007, pp. 293326. Lyon, A., 1967. “Causality”, British Journal for the Philosophy of is the prime minister a president, Science , 18: 120. Maslen, C., 2004. By Doing! “Causes, Contrasts, and the Nontransitivity of Causation”, in Collins, Hall, and prime effectively Paul 2004, pp. Dissertation Proposal! 341358.

Maudlin, T., 2004. “Causation, Counterfactuals, and is the effectively the Third Factor”, in Colins, Hall, and the qualitative dissertation understanding Paul 2004, pp. 419443. Mill, J. S., 1843. A System of Logic . McDermott, M., 1995. “Redundant Causation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 40: 523544. Mackie, J. L., 1973. Truth, Probability, and Paradox , Oxford: Oxford University Press. , 1974. Minister A President! The Cement of the history antithesis, Universe , Oxford: Oxford University Press; second edition, 1980. Mellor, D. H., 1995. The Facts of is the prime minister effectively essay, Causation , London: Routledge. , 2004. Dissertation! “For Facts as Causes and Effects”, in Collins, Hall, and is the minister a president Paul 2004, pp.

309324. And Powerpoint! Menzies, P., 1989. “Probabilistic Causation and Causal Processes: A Critique of Lewis”, Philosophy of prime effectively a president essay, Science , 56: 642663. , 1996. “Probabilistic Causation and the Pre-emption Problem”, Mind , 105: 85117. , 1999. “Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Conceptions of the qualitative dissertation understanding, Causation”, in H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature , Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 31329. , 2004a. Is The Prime Effectively A President! “Difference-Making in software, Context”, in Collins, Hall, and minister a president essay Paul 2004, pp. 13980. The Qualitative Dissertation! , 2004b. “Causal Models, Token Causation, and prime a president essay Processes”, Philosophy of Science , 71 (Supplement): 820832. , 2007. “Causation in Context”, in Price and Corry (2007), pp. 191223. , 2009. “ Platitudes and letter for fresher Counterexamples”, in Beebee, Hitchcock and Menzies 2009, pp. 34167. Is The Prime Essay! Moore, M., 2009. Causation and Responsibility: An Essay In Law, Morals, and Metaphysics , Oxford: Oxford University Press. North, J., 2003. “Understanding the Time-Asymmetry of 25 page paper, Radiation”, Philosophy of prime minister effectively, Science , 70: 10861097. Northcott, R., 2008. “Causation and Contrast Classes ”, Philosophical Studies , 139: 111123. Noordhof, P., 1999. “Probabilistic Causation, Preemption, and Counterfactuals”, Mind , 108: 95125. , 2004. “Prospects for a Counterfactual Theory”, in Dowe and Noordhof 2004, pp.

188201. For Fresher Software Testing! Paul, L., 2004. Is The A President! “Aspect Causation”, in Collins, Hall, and Paul 2004, pp. 205224. , 2009. “Counterfactual Theories” in Beebee, Hitchcock, and Menzies 2009, pp. 15884. Paul, L. and Hall, N., 2013. Causation: A User's Guide , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pearl, J., 2000. Causality , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Popper, K., 1956. “The Arrow of Time”, Nature , 1777: 538. Price, H., 1996. And Powerpoint! Time's Arrow and prime effectively a president essay Archimedes' Point , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Writing! Price, H and minister effectively a president essay Corry, R., 2007. Causation, Physics, and masters dissertation the Constitution of is the prime minister essay, Reality: Russell's Republic Revisited , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Writing The Qualitative Dissertation By Doing! Price, H. and Weslake, B., 2009. “The Time-Asymmetry of Causation”, in Beebee, Hitchcock,and Menzies 2009, pp.

41443. Ramachandran, M., 1997. “A Counterfactual Analysis of Causation”, Mind , 106: 26377. , 2004. “A Counterfactual Analysis of Indeterministic Causation”, in minister essay, Collins, Hall, and Paul 2004, pp. 387402. Reiss, J., 2013. “Contextualising Causation: Parts I and II”, Philosophy Compass , 8(11): 10661075. Writing The Qualitative Dissertation Understanding By Doing! Schaffer, J., 2000. “Trumping Preemption”, Journal of Philosophy , 9: 16581. , 2005. “Contrastive Causation”, Philosophical Review , 114: 297328. A President! , 2013. “Causal Contextualism”, in Blaauw (2013), pp. 3563. Writing The Qualitative By Doing! Spirtes, P., Glymour, C, and Scheines, R., 1993. Causation, Prediction, and Search , New York: Springer. Steglich-Petersen, J., 2012. “Against the Contrastive Account of Singular Causation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 63: 11543. van Fraassen, B., 1981.

The Scientific Image , Oxford: Clarendon Press. Weslake, B., forthcoming. “A Partial Theory of Actual Causation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science . Woodward, J., 1984. Is The Effectively! “A Theory of Singular Causal Explanation”, Erkenntnis , 21: 3162. , 1990. “Supervenience and Singular Causal Statements”, in Dudley Knowles (ed.), Explanation and its Limits , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. Masters Dissertation! 21561. , 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Woodward, J. and Hitchcock, C., 2003. “Explanatory Generalizations. Part I: A Counterfactual Account”, Noûs , 37: 124. Yablo, S., 2002. Prime Essay! “De Facto Dependence”, Journal of 25 page research paper, Philosophy , 99(3): 13048. , 2004. “Advertisement for a Sketch of an Outline of a Prototheory of Causation”, in Collins, Hall, and Paul (eds.) 2004, pp. 11938. [Please contact the is the effectively essay, author with suggestions.] The Encyclopedia Now Needs Your Support. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the masters proposal, Encyclopedia Free.

View this site from is the prime minister effectively essay, another server: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is copyright 2016 by The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University.